Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39775501›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2025

Does familiarity-detection flip attention inward? The familiarity-flip-of-attention account of the primacy effect in memory for repetitions.

Anne M Cleary, Katherine L McNeely-White, Joseph Neisser, Daniel L Drane, Catherine Liégeois-Chauvel, Nigel P Pedersen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anne M ClearyDepartment of Psychology, Colorado State University, 1876 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA. Anne.Cleary@colostate.edu.
Katherine L McNeely-WhiteDepartment of Neurology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, 95816, USA.
Joseph NeisserDepartment of Philosophy, Grinnell College, Grinnell, IA, 50112, USA.
Daniel L DraneDepartment of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Catherine Liégeois-ChauvelDepartment of Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Nigel P PedersenDepartment of Neurology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, 95816, USA.

Funding

Control of the Hippocampal Formation by the Supramammillary Hypothalamus - Anatomy, Physiology and in a Model of Medial Temporal Lobe EpilepsyK08NS105929 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI PEDERSEN, NIGEL PAUL · 2018 to 2023
$963k
NINDS NIH HHS K08 NS105929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In cognitive psychology, research on attention is shifting from focusing primarily on how people orient toward stimuli in the environment toward instead examining how people orient internally toward memory representations. With this new shift the question arises: What factors in the environment send attention inward? A recent proposal is that one factor is cue familiarity-detection (Cleary, Irving & Mills, Cognitive Science, 47, e13274, 2023). Within this theoretical framework, we reinterpret a decades-old empirical pattern-a primacy effect in memory for repetitions-in a novel way. The effect is the finding that altered repetitions of an image were remembered as re-occurrences of the first presentation despite having a changed left-right orientation; participants better retained the first orientation while incorrectly remembering changed instantiations as repetitions of the first orientation (DiGirolamo & Hintzman, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 121-124, 1997). We argue that this pattern, which has never been fully explained, is an existing empirical test of the newly proposed mechanism of cue familiarity-detection flipping attention inward toward memory. Specifically, an image's first appearance is novel so draws attention outward toward encoding the stimulus' attributes like orientation; subsequent mirror-reversed appearances are detected as familiar so flip attention inward toward memory search, which leads to 1) inattentional blindness for the changed orientation due to the familiarity-driven shift of attention inward and 2) memory retrieval of the first instance and its orientation, thereby enhancing memory for the first instance and its previously encoded attributes like orientation.

Indexed as

AttentionMental RecallPattern Recognition, VisualRecognition, PsychologyAdultCuesFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultExternal attentionFamiliarityFamiliarity-detectionFlip of attentionGlobal matchingInternal attentionSwitching of attention

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.