ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2025
In-silico evaluation of the effect of set-up errors on dose delivery during mouse irradiations with a Cs-137 cell irradiator-based collimator system.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Set-up errors are a problem for pre-clinical irradiators that lack imaging capabilities. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the potential set-up errors on the dose distribution for a mouse with a xenographic tumour irradiated with a standard Cs-137 cell irradiator equipped with an in-house lead collimator with 10 mm diameter apertures. The EGSnrc Monte-Carlo (MC) code was used to simulate the potential errors caused by displacements of the mouse in the irradiation setup. The impact of the simulated set-up displacements on the dose delivered to the xenographic tumour and surrounding organs was assessed. MC dose calculations were performed in a Computed Tomography (CT) derived model of the mouse for the reference position of the tumour in the irradiation setup. The errors were added into the CT data and then the mouse doses for the corresponding shifts were recalculated and dose volume histograms (DVHs) were generated. The investigation was performed for 1 cm and 0.5 cm diameter tumours. The DVH resulting from introducing the maximum setup errors for 1 cm diameter tumours showed up to 35% reduced dose to a significant fraction of the tumour volume. The setup errors demonstrated an insignificant effect on doses for 0.5 cm diameter tumour irradiations. Setup errors were observed to have negligible impact on out of field doses to organs at risk. The dosimetric results presented herein verify the robustness of our collimator system for irradiations of xenograft tumours up to 0.5 cm diameter in the presence of the maximum setup errors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39775458What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.