Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39775411›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2025

A Sponsor's Best Practice and Operating Principles to Manage Data Monitoring Committees.

Malene Muusfeldt Birck, Josephine Skovgaard Rasmussen, Ida Carøe Helmark, Karsten Lollike

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Malene Muusfeldt Birck *Safety Surveillance, Novo Nordisk A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Josephine Skovgaard Rasmussen *Safety Surveillance, Novo Nordisk A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ida Carøe HelmarkMedical & Science, Novo Nordisk A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Karsten LollikeGlobal Patient Safety, Novo Nordisk A/S, Copenhagen, Søborg, 2860, Denmark. kalo@novonordisk.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of data monitoring committees (DMC) to safeguard patients' safety in clinical trials has evolved over the last decades and has become increasingly common. To ensure well-operating and high-performing DMCs, pharmaceutical companies need to establish clearly defined operational processes while continuously seeking to optimize these and adapt to the needs of drug development. Although there are health authority guidelines on establishing and managing a DMC, the perspectives and experiences of sponsors are often underrepresented. This publication shares insights on a sponsor, Novo Nordisk (NN), regarding principles and practices for DMC establishment and management across varying trial types and therapeutic areas, including challenges and solutions. Highlighting NN's structured and successful approach to DMCs, it details clearly defined roles and responsibilities that ensure productive DMC meetings and high-quality data for the DMC. Additionally, NN's practices for clear, transparent, and trustful communication between the sponsor, the DMC, and the independent external statistical vendor are described. Processes for quality control, internal audits, and learnings from inspections and how these are incorporated for continuous improvement of the DMC process are discussed. While the processes and practices described are primarily designed for medium and large pharmaceutical companies, certain aspects may also be relevant and beneficial for smaller companies.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicClinical Trials Data Monitoring CommitteesDrug IndustryHumansQuality ControlData Monitoring CommitteeData qualityData Safety Monitoring BoardIndependencyOperating principlesRegulatory requirements

Identifiers

PMID39775411
PMCPMC11880147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.