Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39775401›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

SEMdag: Fast learning of Directed Acyclic Graphs via node or layer ordering.

Mario Grassi, Barbara Tarantino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mario GrassiDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Barbara TarantinoDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6384-2561

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) offers an easy approach to define causal structures among gathered nodes: causal linkages are represented by arrows between the variables, leading from cause to effect. Recently, industry and academics have paid close attention to DAG structure learning from observable data, and many techniques have been put out to address the problem. We provide a two-step approach, named SEMdag(), that can be used to quickly learn high-dimensional linear SEMs. It is included in the R package SEMgraph and employs a two-stage order-based search using previous knowledge (Knowledge-based, KB) or data-driven method (Bottom-up, BU), under the premise that a linear SEM with equal variance error terms is assumed. We evaluated our framework's for finding plausible DAGs against six well-known causal discovery techniques (ARGES, GES, PC, LiNGAM, CAM, NOTEARS). We conducted a series of experiments using observed expression (or RNA-seq) data, taking into account a pair of training and testing datasets for four distinct diseases: Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), Breast cancer (BRCA), Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The results show that the SEMdag() procedure can recover a graph structure with good disease prediction performance evaluated by a conventional supervised learning algorithm (RF): in the scenario where the initial graph is sparse, the BU approach may be a better choice than the KB one; in the case where the graph is denser, both BU an KB report high performance, with highest score for KB approach based on topological layers. Besides its superior disease predictive performance compared to previous research, SEMdag() offers the user the flexibility to define distinct structure learning algorithms and can handle high dimensional issues with less computing load. SEMdag() function is implemented in the R package SEMgraph, easily available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=SEMgraph.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCOVID-19Breast NeoplasmsHumansSARS-CoV-2Software

Identifiers

PMID39775401
PMCPMC11709272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.