ArticlePloS one2025
Targeting necroptosis in MCF-7 breast cancer cells: In Silico insights into 8,12-dimethoxysanguinarine from Eomecon Chionantha through molecular docking, dynamics, DFT, and MEP studies.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Theranostic Potential of Copper-64 ATSM Targeting MTHFD2: An In Silico Perspective on Hypoxia-Selective Imaging and Therapy.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Expression of concern
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer remains a significant challenge in oncology, highlighting the need for alternative therapeutic strategies that target necroptosis to overcome resistance to conventional therapies. Recent investigations into natural compounds have identified 8,12-dimethoxysanguinarine (SG-A) from Eomecon chionantha as a potential necroptosis inducer. This study presents the first computational exploration of SG-A interactions with key necroptotic proteins-RIPK1, RIPK3, and MLKL-through molecular docking, molecular dynamics (MD), density functional theory (DFT), and molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) analyses. Molecular docking revealed that SG-A exhibited a stronger affinity for MLKL (-9.40 kcal/mol) compared to the co-crystallized ligand (-6.29 kcal/mol), while its affinity for RIPK1 (-6.37 kcal/mol) and RIPK3 (-7.01 kcal/mol) was lower. MD simulations further demonstrated the stability of SG-A within the MLKL site, with RMSD values stabilizing between 1.4 and 3.3 Å over 300 ns, indicating a consistent interaction pattern. RMSF analysis indicated the preservation of protein backbone flexibility, with average fluctuations under 1.7 Å. The radius of gyration (Rg) results indicated a consistent value of ~15.3 Å across systems, confirming the role of SG-A in maintaining protein integrity. Notably, SG-A maintains two critical H-bonds within the active site of MLKL, reinforcing the stability of the interaction. Principal component analysis (PCA) indicated a significant reduction in MLKL's conformational space upon SG-A binding, implying enhanced stabilization. Dynamic cross-correlation map (DCCM) analysis further revealed that SG-A induced highly correlated motions, reducing internal fluctuations within MLKL compared to the co-crystallized ligand. MM-PBSA revealed the enhanced binding efficacy of SG-A, with a significant binding free energy of -31.03 ± 0.16 kcal/mol against MLKL, surpassing that of the control (23.96 ± 0.11 kcal/mol). In addition, the individual residue contribution analysis highlighted key interactions, with ARG149 showing a significant contribution (-176.24 kcal/mol) in the MLKL-SG-A complex. DFT and MEP studies corroborated these findings, revealing that the electronic structure of SG-A is conducive to stable binding interactions, characterized by a narrow band gap (~0.16 units) and distinct electrostatic potential favourable for necroptosis induction. In conclusion, SG-A has emerged as a compelling inducer of necroptosis for breast cancer therapy, warranting further experimental validation to fully realize its therapeutic potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.