ReviewMolecular biology reports2025
Structural engineering of flagellin as vaccine adjuvant: quest for the minimal domain of flagellin for TLR5 activation.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Roles of the M2 protein of influenza A virus.Virus genes · 2026Review
- Innovative multi-epitope vaccine engineering for dual protection against Salmonella and Shigella leveraging FliC flagellin protein adjuvant properties: an immunoinformatics-based approach.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Microbiota-innate immune crosstalk drives atherosclerosis: mechanisms, disease progression, and emerging therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Flagellins as Vaccine Adjuvants and Cancer Immunotherapy: Recent Advances and Future Prospects.Immunology · 2025Review
- Flagellin as a Versatile Adjuvant Platform: Genetic Fusion Approaches for Next-Generation Vaccines.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Therapeutic potential of Bacillus sonorensis PMC204 membrane vesicles against drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis.Medical microbiology and immunology · 2025Article
- Biomaterials nanoplatform-based tumor vaccines for immunotherapy.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- Innovation in mRNA Vaccines and RNAi via Protein Nanocages.Vaccines · 2025Review
- Harnessing flagellin ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Flagellin stimulates Toll-like receptor 5 (TLR5), triggering both innate and adaptive immune responses, making it a potential vaccine adjuvant. On mucosal surfaces, flagellin induces a strong release of cytokines, chemokines, and immunoglobulins. When used in its free monomeric form, flagellin has been shown to enhance immune responses when combined with vaccine antigens. Further research demonstrated that genetically linking flagellin to the antigen provides a more consistent immune boost. However, the bulky structure of flagellin presents challenges in designing the antigen-adjuvant construct, leading to ongoing research to determine the minimal flagellin domain necessary for its adjuvant effect. Early findings suggest that only the D0 and D1 domains are required for immune enhancement. Functional analysis revealed that the TLR5-binding region is located in the D1 domain, while TLR5 dimerization and signaling require the presence of D0. Further reductions in the size of the D0 and D1 domains may be possible as deeper studies aim to identify the key residues responsible for TLR5 activation and immune enhancement. Additionally, flagellin is being tested as a hapten carrier alongside its established adjuvant role. Recently, significant advancements in flagellin application have been observed as it progresses through clinical studies as an adjuvant, anti-radiation, and anti-cancer agent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.