ArticlePloS one2024
Evaluating retinal thickness classification in children: A comparison between pediatric and adult optical coherence tomography databases.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Normative Values of Retinal and Choroidal Thickness in a Healthy Pediatric Population Using DRI Triton SS-OCT.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Observational
- Comparison of Two Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomographs for Macular Thickness in Romanian Children Reveals Device-Dependent Normative Data and Significant Gender Differences.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Changes in peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, macular fovea thickness, and perimacular retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in children with hyperopic amblyopia.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Differences in Retinal Thickness and Vessel Density of the Macula and Optic Disc Across Myopic Children and Adolescents.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Age-Related Differences in Optical Coherence Tomography and Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Parameters Between Healthy Children and Adults: A Comparative Analysis in a Caucasian Population.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Normative Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Metrics of Macular Vessel Density and Foveal Avascular Zone in Healthy Children.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study investigates the agreement of children's retinal thickness classification by color category between Topcon 3D OCT-1's built-in adult reference data and our new pediatric database and assesses the correlation of retinal thickness with age and spherical equivalent (SE).
methods160 eyes of 160 healthy children (74 boys, 86 girls) aged 6-18 years (mean: 11.60 ± 3.28 years) were evaluated in this cross-sectional study. The peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer (pRNFL) and macular thickness were determined for the 1st, 5th, 95th, and 99th percentile points. Cohen's κ value and specific agreement between pediatric data and adult reference database were estimated. The correlation between retinal thickness with age and SE was also determined.
resultsThe mean thickness for the total RNFL, average macular, and central macula were 112.05±8.65 μm, 280.24±12.46 μm, and 220.55±17.53 μm, respectively. The overall agreement between the classification of the adult database and pediatric data for pRNFL was ≥90%, with discrepancies in 46 out of 150 eyes (30.67%); for macula, it was above 72%, with discrepancies in 93 out of 153 eyes (60.78%); and for ganglion cell complex and ganglion cell + inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) the agreement was above 84% and 85%, respectively. A significant level of agreement between pediatric data and adult reference data was achieved for temporal RNFL (κ = 0.65), macular perifoveal superior (κ = 0.67), and inferior (κ = 0.63) and inferior GCIPL (κ = 0.67). The correlations between age and retinal thickness were not significant (all p>0.05). Most retinal thickness parameters were positively associated with SE (Pearson's coefficient, r = 0.26 to 0.49, all p<0.05).
conclusionsThe overall agreement for pRNFL and macular thickness measurements in children with the adult reference database was between 72% and 90%. Children's retinal thickness was not significantly correlated with age but was positively associated with spherical equivalent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.