ArticleBiogerontology2025
Marital and living status and biological ageing trajectories: a longitudinal cohort study with a 20-year follow-up.
Article in Biogerontology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Social support and epigenetic aging at the intersections of race, ethnicity, and gender: findings from NHANES 1999-2002.SSM - population health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biomarkers of ageing (BA) can predict health risks beyond chronological age, but little is known about how marital/living status affects longitudinal changes in BA. We examined the association between marital/living status and BA over time using the-Swedish-Adoption/Twin-Study-of-Aging (SATSA) cohort. Four BAs were analyzed: telomere length (TL) (638 individuals; 1603 measurements), DNAmAge (535 individuals; 1392 measurements), cognition (823 individuals; 3218 measurements), and frailty index (FI) (1828 individuals; 9502 measurements). Individuals were born between 1900 and 1948, and data on marital/living status, BAs, and covariates were collected through nine waves of questionnaires and in-person testing from 1986 to 2014. Mixed linear regression with random effects at twin-pair and individual levels were used to assess BA changes for constant marital/living status. Conditional generalized estimating equation assessed within-individual BA changes for varying marital/living status. Results showed that individuals who were consistently unmarried/non-cohabiting (β = 0.291, 95%CI = 0.189-0.393) or living alone (β = 0.203, 95%CI = 0.090-0.316) were more frail, and experienced accelerated frailty (p-for-interaction with age < 0.001 for marital status; p-for-interaction = 0.002 for living status) and cognitive decline (p-for-interaction < 0.001), compared to those married/cohabiting or living with someone Among individuals whose marital/living status changed, frailty was higher when living alone (β = 0.089, 95%CI = 0.017-0.162) and frailty accelerated when they became unmarried/non-cohabiting or were living alone (p-for-interaction < 0.001). Cognitive decline also accelerated when living alone (p-for-interaction = 0.020). No associations were observed for TL and DNAmAge. In conclusion, being unmarried/non-cohabiting or living alone from mid-to-old age is linked to accelerated cognitive decline and frailty. These findings highlight the potential importance of social support networks and living arrangements for healthy ageing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.