ArticlePloS one2025
Assessing the effects of drought stress on photosynthetic performance and physiological resistance in camphor seedling leaves.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contrasting Leaf Adaptation Strategies ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Integrated Transcriptome and Proteome Analysis Provides Insights into the Mechanism ofBiology · 2026Article
- Integrative WGCNA analysis uncovers the molecular framework of melatonin-mediated drought stress mitigation in potato.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Regulatory effects of salt-nitrogen interaction on the growth and photosynthetic characteristics ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Synergistic Effects of Nitrogen Application Enhance Drought Resistance inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Physiological and ecological response of Cinnamomum camphora under drought stress.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Assessment of drought tolerance in peach × almond hybrids to identify promising rootstocks.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Integration of physiological and transcriptomic analyses regarding the effects of exogenous salicylic acid on drought resistance inFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The impact of seasonal short-term drought on plant physiology and resilience is crucial for conservation and management strategies. This study investigated drought stress effects on growth, photosynthetic capacity, and physiological responses of Camphor (Cinnamomum camphora) seedlings in Guangxi province, China. Fertilized potted plants underwent continuous drought treatments to assess varying water supply effects. Treatments included normal water supply (CK), light drought (D1), moderate drought (D2), and severe drought (D3). Physiological indicators including net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), transpiration rate (Tr), and intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) were measured. Additionally, the stomatal limitation value (Ls) was calculated using the formula Ls = 1-Ci/Ca, and water use efficiency (WUE) was computed as Pn/Tr. Furthermore, parameters such as PIABS (Performance Index based on absorbed light energy), WK (the ratio of variable fluorescence FK at the K point to the amplitude FO-FJ), VJ (the ratio of variable fluorescence FJ at the J point to the amplitude FO-FP), ΔI/I0 (the relative amplitude of the 820 nm light absorption curve), superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), and malondialdehyde (MDA) were measured to evaluate the impact of drought stress on various physiological processes and antioxidant enzyme activities. Results showed significant decreases in base diameter growth (GD) and seedling height growth (GH) with increasing drought stress. Notably, moderate (D2) and severe (D3) drought treatments led to negative GD values. GD decreased by 23.79%, 114.85%, and 175.50% for D1, D2, and D3 treatments, respectively, while reductions of 40.00%, 73.33%, and 90.00% in GD were observed compared to the control (CK). Pn decreased significantly across treatments, with D1<CK<D2<D3 in Ci. Stomatal limit value (Ls) and water use efficiency (WUE) followed the order: D1>CK>D2>D3. Light energy transmission to PSI by the unit reaction center (REo/RC) initially increased then decreased, significantly smaller in D3 compared to D1. Conversely, heat dissipation absorbed by the unit reaction center (DIo/RC) increased notably in D3 compared to D1 and CK. PIABS, WK, VJ, and ΔI/I0 decreased over time, while Rubisco enzyme activity decreased, while proline (Pro) levels increased. Superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels significantly increased during D1 treatment but decreased with D2 and D3 treatments. Overall, drought severity had varying impacts on Cinnamomum camphora growth and photosynthetic structure, with D1 treatment maintaining normal growth and metabolic activities, while D2 and D3 treatments resulted in severe membrane damage, rendering seedlings essentially unable to survive. These findings provide a theoretical basis for implementing water management practices and conservation strategies for camphor seedlings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.