Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39775266›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Solving the maximum cut problem using Harris Hawk Optimization algorithm.

Md Rafiqul Islam, Md Shahidul Islam, Pritam Khan Boni, Aldrin Saurov Sarker, Md Asif Anam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Md Rafiqul IslamDepartment of Computer Science, American International University - Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-0777-6747
Md Shahidul IslamDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Asia Pacific, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-1159-8688
Pritam Khan BoniDepartment of Computer Science, American International University - Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Aldrin Saurov SarkerComputer Science and Engineering Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna, Bangladesh.
Md Asif AnamComputer Science and Engineering Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of the max-cut problem is to cut any graph in such a way that the total weight of the edges that are cut off is maximum in both subsets of vertices that are divided due to the cut of the edges. Although it is an elementary graph partitioning problem, it is one of the most challenging combinatorial optimization-based problems, and tons of application areas make this problem highly admissible. Due to its admissibility, the problem is solved using the Harris Hawk Optimization algorithm (HHO). Though HHO effectively solved some engineering optimization problems, is sensitive to parameter settings and may converge slowly, potentially getting trapped in local optima. Thus, HHO and some additional operators are used to solve the max-cut problem. Crossover and refinement operators are used to modify the fitness of the hawk in such a way that they can provide precise results. A mutation mechanism along with an adjustment operator has improvised the outcome obtained from the updated hawk. To accept the potential result, the acceptance criterion has been used, and then the repair operator is applied in the proposed approach. The proposed system provided comparatively better outcomes on the G-set dataset than other state-of-the-art algorithms. It obtained 533 cuts more than the discrete cuckoo search algorithm in 9 instances, 1036 cuts more than PSO-EDA in 14 instances, and 1021 cuts more than TSHEA in 9 instances. But for four instances, the cuts are lower than PSO-EDA and TSHEA. Besides, the statistical significance has also been tested using the Wilcoxon signed rank test to provide proof of the superior performance of the proposed method. In terms of solution quality, MC-HHO can produce outcomes that are quite competitive when compared to other related state-of-the-art algorithms.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputer Simulation

Identifiers

PMID39775266
PMCPMC11684731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.