Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39775253›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Survival machine learning methods for mortality prediction after heart transplantation in the contemporary era.

Lathan Liou, Elizabeth Mostofsky, Laura Lehman, Soziema Salia, Francisco J Barrera, Ying Wei, Amal Cheema, Anuradha Lala, Andrew Beam, Murray A Mittleman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Non-invasive imaging in heart transplant recipients: state of art and future direction.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lathan LiouDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8066-5947
Elizabeth MostofskyDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Laura LehmanDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Soziema SaliaDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Francisco J BarreraDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Ying WeiDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Amal CheemaDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Anuradha LalaZena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute and Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States of America.
Andrew BeamDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Murray A MittlemanDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Funding

Alcohol and Breast Cancer: Genetic Interactions and Effects on Aromatase Inhibitor TherapyK01AA027831 · NIAAA · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI MOSTOFSKY, ELIZABETH · 2019 to 2023
$820k
NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA027831
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although prediction models for heart transplantation outcomes have been developed previously, a comprehensive benchmarking of survival machine learning methods for mortality prognosis in the most contemporary era of heart transplants following the 2018 donor heart allocation policy change is warranted. This study assessed seven statistical and machine learning algorithms-Lasso, Ridge, Elastic Net, Cox Gradient Boost, Extreme Gradient Boost Linear, Extreme Gradient Boost Tree, and Random Survival Forests in a post-policy cohort of 7,160 adult heart-only transplant recipients in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database who received their first transplant on or after October 18, 2018. A cross-validation framework was designed in mlr. Model performance was also compared in a seasonally-matched pre-policy cohort. In the post-policy cohort, Random Survival Forests and Cox Gradient Boost had the highest performances with C-indices of 0.628 and 0.627. The relative importance of some predictive variables differed between the pre-policy and post-policy cohorts, such as the absence of ECMO in the post-policy cohort. Survival machine learning models provide reasonable prediction of 1-year posttransplant mortality outcomes and continual updating of prediction models is warranted in the contemporary era.

Indexed as

Heart TransplantationMachine LearningAdultAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRegistries

Identifiers

PMID39775253
PMCPMC11706460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.