ArticlePloS one2024
Monitoring the impact of confinement on hyphal penetration and fungal behavior.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Self-grown mycelium in confined geometries as nanofluidic devices.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Differences in mycelial turnover and persistence of wood-decay fungi at the microscale.The New phytologist · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Through their expansive mycelium network, soil fungi alter the physical arrangement and chemical composition of their local environment. This can significantly impact bacterial distribution and nutrient transport and can play a dramatic role in shaping the rhizosphere around a developing plant. However, direct observation and quantitation of such behaviors is extremely difficult due to the opacity and complex porosity of the soil microenvironment. In this study, we demonstrate the development and use of an engineered microhabitat to visualize fungal growth in response to varied levels of confinement. Microfluidics were fabricated using photolithography and conventional soft lithography, assembled onto glass slides, and prepared to accommodate fungal cultures. Selected fungal strains across three phyla (Ascomycota: Morchella sextalata, Fusarium falciforme; Mucoromycota: Linnemannia elongata, Podila minutissima, Benniella; Basidiomycota: Laccaria bicolor, and Serendipita sp.) were cultured within microhabitats and imaged using time-lapse microscopy to visualize development at the mycelial level. Fungal hyphae of each strain were imaged as they penetrated through microchannels with well-defined pore dimensions. The hyphal penetration rates through the microchannels were quantified via image analysis. Other behaviors, including differences in the degree of branching, peer movement, and tip strength were also recorded for each strain. Our results provide a repeatable and easy-to-use approach for culturing fungi within a microfluidics platform and for visualizing the impact of confinement on hyphal growth and other fungal behaviors pertinent to their remodeling of the underground environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.