Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39775205›Full record

Trial reportPLoS neglected tropical diseases2024

Randomized, observer-blind, controlled Phase 1 study of the safety and immunogenicity of the Na-GST-1/Alhydrogel hookworm vaccine with or without a CpG ODN adjuvant in hookworm-naïve adults.

David J Diemert, Maria Zumer, Mark Bova, Christina Gibbs-Tewary, Elissa M Malkin, Doreen Campbell, Lara Hoeweler, Guangzhao Li, Maria Elena Bottazzi, Peter J Hotez and 1 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

David J DiemertDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2789-0512
Maria ZumerDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Mark BovaDepartment of Epidemiology, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Christina Gibbs-TewaryDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Elissa M MalkinDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Doreen CampbellDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Lara HoewelerDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Tropical Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Guangzhao LiDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Tropical Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Maria Elena BottazziDivision of Pediatric Tropical Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, National School of Tropical Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital Center for Vaccine Development, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Peter J HotezDivision of Pediatric Tropical Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, National School of Tropical Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital Center for Vaccine Development, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Jeffrey M BethonyDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Tropical Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecombinant Necator americanus Glutathione-S-Transferase-1 (Na-GST-1) formulated on Alhydrogel (Na-GST-1/Alhydrogel) is being developed to prevent anemia and other complications of N. americanus infection. Antibodies induced by vaccination with recombinant Na-GST-1 are hypothesized to interfere with the blood digestion pathway of adult hookworms in the host. Phase 1 trials have demonstrated the safety of Na-GST-1 formulated on Alhydrogel, but further optimization of the vaccine adjuvant formulation may improve humoral immune responses, thereby increasing the likelihood of vaccine efficacy.

methodsA randomized, observer-blind, dose escalation Phase 1 trial was conducted in 24 healthy, hookworm-naïve adults. In each cohort of 12 participants, 4 were randomized to receive 100 µg of Na-GST-1/Alhydrogel and 8 to receive 30 µg or 100 µg of Na-GST-1/Alhydrogel plus the Cytosine-phospho-Guanine (CpG) oligodeoxynucleotide Toll-like receptor-9 agonist, CpG 10104, in the first and second cohorts, respectively. Progression to the second cohort was dependent upon evaluation of 7-day safety data after all participants in the first cohort had received the first dose of vaccine. Three intramuscular injections of study product were administered on days 0, 56, and 112, after which participants were followed for 6 months. IgG and IgG subclass antibody responses to Na-GST-1 were measured by qualified indirect ELISAs at pre- and post-vaccination time points.

resultsNa-GST-1/Alhydrogel administered with or without CpG 10104 was well-tolerated. The most common solicited adverse events were mild injection site tenderness and pain, and mild headache. There were no vaccine-related serious adverse events or adverse events of special interest. Both dose concentrations of Na-GST-1/Alhydrogel plus CpG 10104 had significantly higher post-vaccination levels of antigen-specific IgG antibody compared to Na-GST-1/Alhydrogel without CpG, starting after the second injection. Peak anti-Na-GST-1 IgG levels were observed between 2 and 4 weeks following the third dose, regardless of Na-GST-1 formulation. IgG levels decreased but remained significantly above baseline in all groups by day 290, at which point all participants (20 of 20 evaluable participants) still had detectable IgG. Longitudinal antigen-specific IgG1 and IgG3 subclass responses mirrored those of total IgG, whereas IgG4 responses were lower in the groups that received the vaccine with the CpG adjuvant compared to the non-CpG group.

conclusionsVaccination of hookworm-naïve adults with Na-GST-1/Alhydrogel plus CpG 10104 was safe and minimally reactogenic. Addition of CpG 10104 to Na-GST-1/Alhydrogel resulted in significant improvement in IgG responses against the vaccine antigen. These promising results have led to inclusion of the CpG 10104 formulation of Na-GST-1/Alhydrogel in a Phase 2 proof-of-concept controlled human infection trial.

Indexed as

Antibodies, HelminthGlutathione TransferaseNecator americanusOligodeoxyribonucleotidesAdjuvants, ImmunologicAdjuvants, VaccineAdolescentAdultAluminum HydroxideAnimalsAntigens, HelminthFemaleHookworm InfectionsHumansImmunoglobulin GMaleAdjuvants, ImmunologicAdjuvants, VaccineAluminum HydroxideAntibodies, HelminthAntigens, HelminthCPG-oligonucleotideGlutathione TransferaseImmunoglobulin GOligodeoxyribonucleotidesVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID39775205
PMCPMC11717351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.