ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparison of Gensini score and SYNTAX score for predicting in-stent restenosis in patients with coronary artery disease and drug-eluting stent implantation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio with the severity of coronary artery lesions in patients undergoing coronary angiography for the first time.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026Article
- Repurposing Coronary Risk Scores to Identify Increased Likelihood of Atrial Fibrillation in Chronic Coronary Syndrome.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Association of the cholesterol-high-density lipoprotein-glucose index with coronary atherosclerotic burden in patients with coronary artery disease.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Insights into the Use of Erythrocyte and Platelet Distribution Indices for Assessing the Extent of Coronary Lesions.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Observational
- Ferroptosis Related Serum Gpx4 Correlates to Severity of Coronary Artery Stenosis, and in-Stent Restenosis in Patients.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2025Article
- Dysregulation of Serum miR-212-3p Serves as a Biomarker to Predict Disease Onset and Short-Term Prognosis in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2025Article
- Association of platelet to high density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio with coronary lesion severity in middle aged and elderly adults.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Association between soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 and risk and severity of coronary artery disease: a case control study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Retrospective Cohort Study: Nomogram for 1-Year in-Stent Restenosis After PCI in Coronary Heart Disease.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The present study was aimed to investigate whether Gensini score or SYNTAX score was a valuable tool to predict in-stent restenosis (ISR) in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with drug-eluting stents (DES) implantation. A retrospective case-control study and a validating retrospective cohort study were designed. All subjects' information was collected from the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University. A total of 916 patients were enrolled in the case-control study, and 961 subjects were included in the retrospective-cohort study. In the case-control study, significant differences were observed between the ISR and non-ISR groups regarding baseline characteristics and clinical examinations, including waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, blood glucose levels, ApoA1 levels, left ventricular ejection fraction, lesion vessels, Gensini score, and SYNTAX score (all P < 0.05). All parameters showing significant differences were also associated with ISR (all P < 0.05). However, after adjustment for confounders, both Gensini score [tertile 3 vs. tertile 1 with OR 95%CI: 15.61 (5.37-45.39)] and SYNTAX score [high risk ≥ 33 vs. low risk ≤ 22 with OR 95%CI 12.61 (5.14-30.94)] were still independently associated with ISR. Furthermore, Gensini score [AUC 95%CI: 0.81 (0.78-0.84)] and SYNTAX score [AUC 95%CI: 0.76 (0.72-0.79)] showed a moderate ability to predict ISR. The predictors were further verified in a cohort validation study, which confirmed that the Gensini score was a better predictor for ISR than SYNTAX score, with an AUC and 95%CI of 0.67 (0.60-0.73) and 0.53 (0.46-0.60), respectively. Gensini score showed a higher capability to predict ISR than SYNTAX score in CAD patients with DES implantation. SYNTAX score may also be a useful tool for assessing the risk of ISR in patients with multivessel lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.