ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2025
Advancing Myocarditis Research: Evaluating Animal Models for Enhanced Pathophysiological Insights.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intestinal Flora and Myocarditis: Potential Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies Affecting Disease Progression and Cardiac Function.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review aims to assess the current landscape of animal models used in myocarditis research, with a focus on understanding their utility in uncovering the pathophysiology of the disease. The goal is to evaluate these models' strengths and weaknesses and propose optimizations to make them more relevant and reliable for both mechanistic studies and therapeutic interventions in myocarditis. RECENT
findingsRecent studies have primarily utilized animal models, particularly viral and autoimmune myocarditis models, to study disease mechanisms. Coxsackievirus remains the most common virus used in viral myocarditis models, offering high success rates but limited applicability to human cases due to differences in infection patterns. Autoimmune myocarditis models, often involving humanized mice, have made strides in mimicking human immune responses but still face challenges in accuracy and clinical relevance. COVID-19 has introduced new avenues for research, especially concerning vaccine-induced myocarditis, although findings remain preliminary. Animal models remain crucial for myocarditis research, but each comes with distinct challenges. Viral models excel in success rate but suffer from partial relevance to human conditions. Autoimmune models are useful in immunological studies, though costly and less replicable. Vaccine-associated models are closely related to modern clinical conditions, but lack theoretical support and therefore lack reliability. Optimizing these models could improve our understanding of myocarditis and lead to more effective treatments. Future research should aim to refine these models to better simulate human conditions and enhance their clinical applicability, ultimately advancing the diagnosis and treatment of myocarditis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39775161What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.