ArticleScientific reports2025
Analyzing temporal imaging patterns in acute ischemic stroke via DICOM-timestamps.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analytics Methodology to Quantify MRI Exam Utilization.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Automating the assessment of quality indicators using a clinical data warehouse: a pilot study on door-to-imaging time in stroke management.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute stroke management is time-sensitive, making time data crucial for both research and quality management. However, these time data are often not reliably captured in routine clinical practice. In this proof-of-concept study we analysed image-based time data automatically captured in the DICOM format. We enrolled data from two separate stroke centers (n = 3136 and n = 2089). Data from the first center was additionally separated into groups with large-vessel-occlusion (LVO, n = 1.092), medium-vessel-occlusions (MVO, n = 416), and no occlusion (NVO, n = 1630). The DICOM-tag StudyTime was used to analyze the distribution of scan times throughout the day. Additionally, manually documented onset- and admission were extracted from the patients' records in a subset of cases (n = 347). Timestamps were compared across centers and occlusion groups, and a probabilistic model was developed to illustrate and compare stroke occurrence patterns throughout the day. The temporal distribution of the scan times at both centers was exceptionally consistent with a peak around noon and a nighttime low. The groups with vessel occlusions showed an earlier peak compared to those without (p < 0.04). The median interval between admission and scan time was 23 min, while the median onset-to-imaging time was 1 h:54 min. This proof-of-concept study indicates that DICOM-timestamps can reveal insights into the temporal patterns of stroke imaging and may be a promising tool for quality control and stroke research in general since they are always automatically captured by imaging devices as opposed to manual data collection in routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.