Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39775113›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025

Developing alert thresholds and self-management advice for people receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: a Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer modified Delphi survey.

Julia Lai-Kwon, Claudia Rutherford, Stephanie Best, Hope S Rugo, Christina H Ruhlmann, Michael Jefford

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julia Lai-KwonDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia. Julia.Lai-Kwon@petermac.org.
Claudia RutherfordSydney Quality of Life Office, Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Stephanie BestDepartment of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Hope S RugoUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
Christina H RuhlmannDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Michael JeffordDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRemote monitoring using electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) may help identify immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and direct self-management. There is no consensus regarding thresholds to alert providers about potentially severe irAEs or when to instigate evidence-based self-management. We aimed to develop consensus around alert thresholds and self-management advice for side-effects suggestive of an irAE which can be deployed as part of remote monitoring systems.

methodsA two-round international modified Delphi survey including co-authors of major international irAE guidelines and selected immuno-oncology experts was conducted. Round 1 (R1): participants reviewed alert thresholds graded as per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and self-management statements for 36 side-effects. Participants stated whether they agreed or disagreed with the proposed thresholds and self-management statements. If ≥ 75% of participants agreed, consensus was reached. Prior to Round 2 (R2), thresholds and self-management statements that did not reach consensus in R1 were modified. In R2, participants were asked whether they agreed or disagreed with the modifications.

resultsIn R1, 34 participants responded (North America: 18, 52.9%; Europe: 12, 35.3%; Asia-Pacific: 4, 11.8%; median duration of experience in current role, 13.5 years (range, 3-46 years)), with 33 complete responses received. Twenty-nine alert thresholds and 33 self-management statements reached consensus. For R2, seven alert thresholds were increased from CTCAE Grade 1 to 2 based on participant comments, and three self-management statements were amended. Six self-management statements which achieved consensus were amended and re-presented in R2. In R2, 31 participants responded (North America: 18, 58.1%; Europe: 9, 29%; Asia-Pacific: 4, 12.9%; median duration of experience in current role, 13 years (range, 3-40 years)), with 30 complete responses received. All seven alert thresholds and nine self-management statements achieved consensus.

conclusionThis survey developed international consensus regarding alert thresholds and self-management advice for common, clinically relevant side-effects suggestive of an irAE for ePRO monitoring systems with international applicability. Self-management statements will inform written materials for patients.

Indexed as

Delphi TechniqueImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoplasmsSelf-ManagementConsensusHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresSurveys and QuestionnairesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsDelphiDigital healthElectronic patient-reported outcomesImmune checkpoint inhibitorsImmunotherapyPatient-reported outcomesSymptom monitoring

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.