ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Willingness to pay for exercise oncology services: a mixed methods study.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate cancer patients' willingness to pay for exercise services and oncology health professionals' perception of patients' willingness to pay.
methodsA mixed-methods design was used. Online questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were administered to people with any type of cancer and oncology health professionals delivering clinical care. Questionnaires assessed patients' willingness to pay for one consultation with a cancer-trained exercise specialist (i.e. exercise physiologist/physiotherapist) and regular group exercise sessions supervised by cancer-trained exercise specialists. Interviews probed factors associated with the out-of-pocket cost of adopting exercise guidelines. Data were analysed using standard descriptive statistics and an interpretive descriptive approach to qualitative analysis.
resultsParticipants included 450 cancer patients and 300 oncology health professionals. A randomly selected sub-set of 30 patients and 31 health professionals completed interviews. The majority of patients surveyed would pay for an exercise consultation (94%) and regular group exercise sessions (58.4% extremely likely; 24.7% moderately likely; standard 7-point Likert scale response options). A greater proportion of patients who were employed (97.2% p = 0.030), below average general health (97.0% p = 0.031), were female (96.1% p = 0.013), and insufficiently active (95.3% p = 0.048) were willing to pay for exercise services. Oncology health professionals perceived fewer patients would be willing to pay for exercise services (p < 0.001; consultation = 7.0% extremely likely, 32.7% moderately likely; regular supervised sessions = 5.3% extremely likely; 32.0% moderately likely).
conclusionsWhen briefly informed of the benefits and costs of exercise, the majority of patients in this study would pay for cancer-specific exercise services. There is an opportunity to align perceptions of willingness to pay among patients and health professionals involved in their care to help facilitate the uptake of exercise guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39775110What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.