Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39775096›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Analysis of early efficacy and immune reconstitution after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma.

Kaili Chen, Huixin Liang, Zezhong Yu, Guangyao Guo, Huijian Zheng, Yun Huang, Liping Liu, Jie Lin, Jinlan Long, Renyao Pan and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Kaili Chen *Department of Blood Transfusion, Affiliated Hospital of Putian University, Putian, 351100, China.
Huixin Liang *Department of infectious diseases, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, 29 Xinquan Rd, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Zezhong YuFujian Institute of Hematology, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory on Hematology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, 29 Xinquan Rd, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Guangyao GuoFujian Institute of Hematology, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory on Hematology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, 29 Xinquan Rd, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Huijian ZhengFujian Institute of Hematology, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory on Hematology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, 29 Xinquan Rd, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Yun HuangFujian Institute of Hematology, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory on Hematology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, 29 Xinquan Rd, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Liping LiuFujian Institute of Hematology, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory on Hematology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, 29 Xinquan Rd, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Jie LinFujian Institute of Hematology, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory on Hematology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, 29 Xinquan Rd, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Jinlan LongFujian Institute of Hematology, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory on Hematology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, 29 Xinquan Rd, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Renyao PanFujian Institute of Hematology, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory on Hematology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, 29 Xinquan Rd, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Xi ChenFujian Institute of Hematology, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory on Hematology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, 29 Xinquan Rd, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Changgui WangFujian Institute of Hematology, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory on Hematology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, 29 Xinquan Rd, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Wenjie ZhangFujian Institute of Hematology, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory on Hematology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, 29 Xinquan Rd, Fuzhou, 350001, China. wenjiezhang967@126.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4326-8552
Zhenshu XuFujian Institute of Hematology, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory on Hematology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, 29 Xinquan Rd, Fuzhou, 350001, China. xuzs@fjmu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-4803-3990

Funding

Fujian Provincial Clinical Research Center for Hematological Malignancies 2020Y2006Joint Funds for the Innovation of Science and Technology of Fujian Province 2023Y9173National Key Clinical Specialty Discipline Construction Program 2021-76National Natural Science Foundation of China 82270175Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China 2021J02040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This retrospective study aimed to stress the advantages of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) in treating primary MM. Ninety-four MM patients who underwent initial parallel sequential auto-HSCT were selected. Data on efficacy (efficacy evaluation, renal function and hemoglobin recovery), immune reconstitution (B-cell subsets, immunoglobulin levels, T-cell subsets, NK cells, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR)) and hematopoietic reconstitution times were collected and analyzed. Whether in all selected patients or in groups R-ISS II-III, there was a notable increase in the proportion of patients achieving in a very good partial response (VGPR) or better (P < 0.001, P = 0.02) and a complete response (CR) or better (P = 0.007, P = 0.014) after transplantation compared to the pre-transplant status. Post-Transplant Immune Reconstitution Analysis (Baseline vs. Pre-Transplant and Pre-Transplant vs. Post-Transplant): The level of CD19 + B cells, CD20 + B cells, CD22 + B cells, CD3 + T cells, IgG and LMR showed the same change trend, that is, it decreased before transplantation (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P<0.007, P < 0.001) and then increased significantly after transplantation(P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001). CD3 + CD4 + T cells from 545.97 (342.11,708.60)/µL to 342.93 (168.38, 475.52)/µL (P < 0.001) and then to 251.48 (188.52, 406.98)/µL (P = 0.348); CD3 + CD8 + T cells from 391.36 (242.19, 563.37)/µL to 337.23 (192.54, 505.96)/µL (P = 0.065) and then to 797.96 (514.49, 1198.03)/µL (P < 0.001), so the CD3 + CD4+/CD3 + CD8 + T cell ratio still remained inverted post-transplant. NK cells changed from 309.86 (206.33, 460.96)/µL to 258.31 (160.75, 436.68)/ µL (P = 0.229) and then to 151.08 (108.17, 240.84)/µL (P = 0.007). Auto-HSCT can promote prolonged remission in patients with MM and also overcome some high-risk factors to achieve superior efficacy in group R-ISS II-III. Patients were immunodeficient before transplantation and auto-HSCT facilitated immune reconstitution.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationImmune ReconstitutionMultiple MyelomaTransplantation, AutologousAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAutologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantationEfficacy analysisImmune reconstitutionMultiple myeloma

Identifiers

PMID39775096
PMCPMC11707290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.