Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39775076›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

External validation of an artificial intelligence model using clinical variables, including ICD-10 codes, for predicting in-hospital mortality among trauma patients: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Seungseok Lee, Do Wan Kim, Na-Eun Oh, Hayeon Lee, Seoyoung Park, Dong Keon Yon, Wu Seong Kang, Jinseok Lee

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Seungseok Lee *Department of Biomedical Engineering, Kyung Hee University, 446-701 Electronic Information College Building, Kyunghee Univ, Global Campus, Seocheon-dong, Giheung-gu, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea.
Do Wan Kim *Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Na-Eun OhDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Kyung Hee University, 446-701 Electronic Information College Building, Kyunghee Univ, Global Campus, Seocheon-dong, Giheung-gu, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea.
Hayeon LeeDepartment of Electronics and Information Convergence Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin-si, Republic of Korea.
Seoyoung ParkCenter for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Dong Keon YonCenter for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Wu Seong Kang *Department of Trauma Surgery, Jeju Regional Trauma Center, Cheju Halla General Hospital, 65, Doryeong-ro, Jeju-si, Jeju-do, Republic of Korea. wuseongkang@naver.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0136-4458
Jinseok Lee *Department of Biomedical Engineering, Kyung Hee University, 446-701 Electronic Information College Building, Kyunghee Univ, Global Campus, Seocheon-dong, Giheung-gu, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea. gonasago@khu.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0002-8580-490X

Funding

Korea Medical Device Development Fund RS-2020-KD000095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is being increasingly applied in healthcare to improve patient care and clinical outcomes. We previously developed an AI model using ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision) codes with other clinical variables to predict in-hospital mortality among trauma patients from a nationwide database. This study aimed to externally validate the performance of the AI model. Validation was conducted using a multicenter retrospective cohort study design, analyzing patient data from January 2020 to December 2021. The study included trauma patients based on specific ICD-10 codes, with other clinical variables. The performance of the AI model was evaluated against conventional metrics, including the ISS, and the ICISS (ICD-based ISS), using sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, balanced accuracy, precision, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analyses. Data from 4,439 patients were analyzed. The AI model demonstrated high overall performance, achieving an AUROC of 0.9448 and a balanced accuracy of 85.08%, thereby outperforming traditional scoring systems such as ISS, or ICISS. Furthermore, the model accurately predicted mortality across datasets from each hospital (AUROCs of 0.9234 and 0.9653, respectively) despite significant differences in hospital characteristics. In the subset of patients with ISS < 9, the model showed a robust AUROC of 0.9043, indicating its effectiveness in predicting mortality, even in cases with lower-severity injuries. For patients with ISSs ≥ 9, the model maintained high sensitivity (93.60%) and balanced accuracy (77.08%), proving its reliability in more severe injury cases. External validation demonstrated the AI model's high predictive accuracy and reliability in assessing in-hospital mortality risk among trauma patients across different injury severities and heterogeneous cohorts. These findings support the model's potential integration into emergency departments and offer a significant tool for enhancing patient triage and treatment protocols.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceHospital MortalityInternational Classification of DiseasesWounds and InjuriesAdultAgedCohort StudiesDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesROC CurveArtificial IntelligenceExternal validationICD-10In-Hospital mortalityInjury Severity scoreTrauma patients

Identifiers

PMID39775076
PMCPMC11707174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.