Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39775064›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neurology2025

Challenges in multinational rare disease clinical studies during COVID-19: regulatory assessment of cipaglucosidase alfa plus miglustat in adults with late-onset Pompe disease.

Benedikt Schoser, Shahram Attarian, Ryan Graham, Fred Holdbrook, Mitchell Goldman, Jordi Díaz-Manera, ATB200-03 study group

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03729362 (A Phase 3 Double-blind Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous ATB200 Co-administered With Oral AT2221 in Adult Subjects With Late-onset Pompe Disease Compared With Alglucosidase Alfa/Placebo), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03729362 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3 Double-blind Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous ATB200 Co-administered With Oral AT2221 in Adult Subjects With Late-onset Pompe Disease Compared With Alglucosidase Alfa/Placebo

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmicus TherapeuticsRan2018 to 2021Enrolled125ConditionsPompe Disease (Late-onset)ArmsCipaglucosidase Alfa, Miglustat, Alglucosidase Alfa, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Benedikt SchoserFriedrich-Baur-Institute, Department of Neurology, LMU University Clinic, Munich, Germany. benedikt.schoser@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2757-8131
Shahram AttarianReference Center for Neuromuscular Diseases and ALS, La Timone University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Ryan GrahamAmicus Therapeutics UK Ltd, Marlow, UK.
Fred HoldbrookAmicus Therapeutics, Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA.
Mitchell GoldmanAmicus Therapeutics, Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA.
Jordi Díaz-ManeraJohn Walton Muscular Dystrophy Research Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.
ATB200-03 study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PROPEL (ATB200-03; NCT03729362) compared the efficacy and safety of cipaglucosidase alfa plus miglustat (cipa + mig), a two-component therapy for late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD), versus alglucosidase alfa plus placebo (alg + pbo). The primary endpoint was change in 6-min walk distance (6MWD) from baseline to week 52. During PROPEL, COVID-19 interrupted some planned study visits and assessment windows, leading to delayed visits, make-up assessments for patients who missed ≥ 3 successive infusions before planned assessments at weeks 38 and 52, and some advanced visits (end-of-study/early-termination visits). These were remapped to the respective planned visits. To evaluate if remapping may have overestimated treatment effects, we conducted post hoc analyses using a mixed-effect model for repeated measures based on actual time points of assessments. In this post hoc analysis, estimated mean treatment difference between cipa + mig and alg + pbo for change from baseline to week 52 in 6MWD was 11.7 m (95% confidence interval [CI] - 1.0 to 24.4; p = 0.072). In the original published analyses, between-group difference using last observation carried forward was 13.6 m (95% CI - 2.8 to 29.9; p = 0.071 [p value from separate non-parametric analysis of covariance]). Both statistical analysis approaches led to similar results and consistent conclusions, confirming the efficacy of cipa + mig for adults with LOPD. NCT03729362; trial start date: December 4, 2018.Trial registration number.

Indexed as

1-Deoxynojirimycinalpha-GlucosidasesCOVID-19Glycogen Storage Disease Type IIAdultDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment Outcome1-Deoxynojirimycinalpha-GlucosidasesGAA protein, humanmiglustatActual time points of assessmentsAlpha glucosidasesData analysesGlycogen storage disease type IILysosomal storage diseasesMyozyme

Identifiers

PMID39775064
PMCPMC11706903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.