Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39775039›Full record

Trial reportNature medicine2025

Angiogenic factors versus fetomaternal Doppler for fetal growth restriction at term: an open-label, randomized controlled trial.

Pablo Garcia-Manau, Erika Bonacina, Raquel Martin-Alonso, Lourdes Martin, Ana Palacios, Maria Luisa Sanchez-Camps, Cristina Lesmes, Ivan Hurtado, Esther Perez, Albert Tubau and 32 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readEquivalence TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04502823 (Management of Fetal Growth Restriction at Term), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04502823 nacompletednot on this map

Management of Fetal Growth Restriction at Term: Angiogenic Factors Versus Feto-placental Doppler (GRAFD Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research InstituteRan2020 to 2022Enrolled1,088ConditionsFetal Growth RetardationArmsManagement based on sFlt-1/PlGF values
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

42 authors.

Pablo Garcia-ManauDepartament de Pediatria, Obstetrícia i Ginecologia i de Medicina Preventiva i Salut Pública, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2415-1626
Erika BonacinaDepartament de Pediatria, Obstetrícia i Ginecologia i de Medicina Preventiva i Salut Pública, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8042-8247
Raquel Martin-AlonsoDepartment of Obstetrics, Hospital Universitario de Torrejón, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1075-3789
Lourdes MartinDepartment of Obstetrics, Hospital Universitari de Tarragona Joan XXIII, Tarragona, Spain.
Ana PalaciosDepartment of Obstetrics, Hospital General Universitari Dr. Balmis, Alicante, Spain.
Maria Luisa Sanchez-CampsDepartment of Obstetrics, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain.
Cristina LesmesDepartament de Pediatria, Obstetrícia i Ginecologia i de Medicina Preventiva i Salut Pública, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.
Ivan HurtadoDepartament de Pediatria, Obstetrícia i Ginecologia i de Medicina Preventiva i Salut Pública, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0084-1710
Esther PerezDepartment of Obstetrics, Hospital Universitario de Cabueñes, Gijón, Spain.
Albert TubauDepartment of Obstetrics, Hospital Universitari Son Llàtzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5460-0763
Patricia IbañezDepartment of Obstetrics, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain.
Marina AlcozDepartment of Obstetrics, Fundació Althaia, Manresa, Spain.
Nuria ValiñoDepartment of Obstetrics, Hospital Universitario de A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Elena MorenoDepartment of Obstetrics, Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Elche, Spain.
Carlota BorreroDepartment of Obstetrics, Hospital Universitario Virgen de Valme, Seville, Spain.
Esperanza GarciaDepartment of Obstetrics, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Terrassa, Spain.
Eva Lopez-QuesadaDepartment of Obstetrics, Hospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa, Terrassa, Spain.
Sonia DiazDepartment of Obstetrics, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Spain.
Jose Roman BroullonDepartment of Obstetrics, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, Spain.
Mireia TeixidorDepartment of Obstetrics, Hospital Universitari de Girona Doctor Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain.
Carolina ChulillaDepartment of Obstetrics, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.
Roser Ferrer-CostaDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain.
Maria M GilDepartment of Obstetrics, Hospital Universitario de Torrejón, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9993-5249
Monica LopezDepartment of Obstetrics, Hospital Universitari de Tarragona Joan XXIII, Tarragona, Spain.
Gemma M Ramos-FornerDepartment of Obstetrics, Hospital General Universitari Dr. Balmis, Alicante, Spain.
José Eliseo BlancoDepartment of Obstetrics, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0511-3533
Anna MorenoDepartment of Obstetrics, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Sabadell, Spain.
Marta Lázaro-RodríguezDepartment of Obstetrics, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.
Oscar VaquerizoDepartment of Obstetrics, Hospital Universitario de Cabueñes, Gijón, Spain.
Beatriz SorianoDepartment of Obstetrics, Hospital Universitari Son Llàtzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6092-3996
Marta FabreAragon Institute for Health Research, Zaragoza, Spain.
Elena Gomez-ValenciaDepartment of Obstetrics, Fundació Althaia, Manresa, Spain.
Ana CuiñaDepartment of Obstetrics, Hospital Universitario de A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Nicolas AlayonDepartment of Obstetrics, Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Elche, Spain.
Jose Antonio Sainz-BuenoDepartment of Obstetrics, Hospital Universitario Virgen de Valme, Seville, Spain.
Angels VivesDepartment of Obstetrics, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Terrassa, Spain.
Esther EsteveDepartment of Obstetrics, Hospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa, Terrassa, Spain.
Vanesa OcañaDepartment of Obstetrics, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Spain.
Miguel Ángel LópezDepartment of Obstetrics, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, Spain.
Anna MarotoDepartment of Obstetrics, Hospital Universitari de Girona Doctor Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain.
Elena Carreras *Departament de Pediatria, Obstetrícia i Ginecologia i de Medicina Preventiva i Salut Pública, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.
Manel Mendoza *Departament de Pediatria, Obstetrícia i Ginecologia i de Medicina Preventiva i Salut Pública, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain. manel.mendoza@uab.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3030-3833

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small fetuses, with estimated fetal weight (EFW) below the tenth percentile, are classified as fetal growth restriction (FGR) or small for gestational age (SGA) based on prenatal ultrasound. FGR fetuses have a greater risk of stillbirth and perinatal complications and may benefit from serial ultrasound scans to guide early delivery. Abnormal serum angiogenic factors, such as the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1):placental growth factor (PlGF) ratio, have shown potential to more accurately distinguish FGR from SGA, with fewer false positives. This randomized controlled trial compared a management protocol based on the sFlt-1:PlGF with EFW and Doppler ultrasound in avoiding adverse perinatal outcomes in small fetuses after 36 weeks of gestation. A total of 1,088 pregnant women with singleton pregnancies were randomized to either the Doppler-based (control) or the sFlt-1:PlGF-based (intervention) protocol. The primary outcome, neonatal acidosis or Cesarean delivery as a result of abnormal cardiotocography, was assessed in 1,013 participants. The incidence was 10.5% in the intervention group and 10.0% in the control group (absolute difference, 0.53 (-3.21 to 4.26)), with the upper limit of the confidence interval <8.5%, confirming noninferiority. Thus, the sFlt-1:PlGF was noninferior to EFW and Doppler ultrasound in avoiding neonatal acidosis or Cesarean delivery owing to nonreassuring fetal status in small fetuses after 36 weeks (ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04502823 ).

Indexed as

Angiogenesis Inducing AgentsFetal Growth RetardationPlacenta Growth FactorUltrasonography, DopplerUltrasonography, PrenatalVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1AdultFemaleFetal WeightGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Small for Gestational AgePregnancyAngiogenesis Inducing AgentsFLT1 protein, humanPGF protein, humanPlacenta Growth FactorVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.