ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2025
Male seminal fluid allocation according to socio-sexual context in the South American fruit fly.
Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During copulation male insects transfer sperm and seminal fluids, including accessory gland proteins (Acps) to females, produced in the accessory glands (AGs). These Acps influence female behavior and physiology, inhibiting sexual receptivity, promoting ovulation and/or oviposition. The theory of ejaculate allocation postulates that production is costly; therefore, males strategically allocate ejaculates based on perception of sperm competition and quality and availability of females. The objective of this study was to determine in the South American fruit fly Anastrepha fraterculus whether there is differential allocation of Acps by males under different social contexts: (i) presence or absence of males in the mating arena (male social context), (ii) presence/absence of females in the mating arena (female social context), and (iii) female condition (sugar-fed/protein-fed). This was inferred through female behavior (fecundity, fertility and remating) and the dynamics of the reduction in male AGs size and protein content after copulation. No effect was observed from the various social contexts perceived by males on female's fecundity, fertility, or remating. Mated males had less protein in their AGs compared to unmated males. Male social context affected AG size after copulation: there was a marked decrease in AG size in males which mated in the presence of rival males; moreover, males mated under competition had lower protein content in their AGs than males mating without competition, suggesting that males can adjust seminal fluid quantity depending on social-mating context, although this difference did not impact the physiology and behavior of females after copulation. Our results also indicate that AG size and protein content are correlated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39775031What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.