Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39774993›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Ten-year outcomes after DMEK, DSAEK, and PK: insights on graft survival, endothelial cell density loss, rejection and visual acuity.

Theresa Isabelle Wilhelm, Laura Gauché, Daniel Böhringer, Philip Maier, Sonja Heinzelmann, Mateusz Glegola, Paola Kammrath Betancor, Thomas Reinhard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Predictors of long-term graft survival after descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Theresa Isabelle WilhelmEye Center, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Kilianstraße 5, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Laura GauchéEye Center, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Kilianstraße 5, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Daniel BöhringerEye Center, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Kilianstraße 5, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. daniel.boehringer@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
Philip MaierEye Center, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Kilianstraße 5, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Sonja HeinzelmannEye Center, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Kilianstraße 5, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Mateusz GlegolaEye Center, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Kilianstraße 5, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Paola Kammrath BetancorEye Center, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Kilianstraße 5, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Thomas ReinhardEye Center, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Kilianstraße 5, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy (FECD) is the most frequent indication for corneal transplantation, with Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), and penetrating keratoplasty (PK) being viable options. This retrospective study compared 10-year outcomes of these techniques in a large cohort of 2956 first-time keratoplasty eyes treated for FECD at a high-volume corneal transplant center in Germany. While DMEK and DSAEK provided faster visual recovery (median time to BSCVA ≥ 6/12 Snellen: DMEK 7.8 months, DSAEK 12.4 months, PK 37.9 months; cumulative probability of BSCVA ≥ 6/12 Snellen within 5 years: DMEK 93%, DSAEK 83%, PK 63%), PK surprisingly exhibited superior long-term graft survival (92% vs. 75% for DMEK and 73% for DSAEK at 10 years). Endothelial cell density (ECD) decreased significantly faster after DMEK and DSAEK, potentially contributing to their lower graft survival (10-year ECD > 1000 cells/mm

Indexed as

Descemet Stripping Endothelial KeratoplastyFuchs' Endothelial DystrophyGraft RejectionGraft SurvivalVisual AcuityAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCell CountEndothelial CellsEndothelium, CornealFemaleHumansKeratoplasty, PenetratingMaleMiddle AgedCorneal transplantationDMEKDSAEKFuchs endothelial corneal dystrophyGraft survivalPenetrating keratoplasty

Identifiers

PMID39774993
PMCPMC11707042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.