Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39774973›Full record

Trial reportExperimental brain research2025

Acute hypoalgesic and neurophysiological responses to lower-limb ischaemic preconditioning.

Ryan Norbury, Ian Grant, Alex Woodhead, Stephen D Patterson

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ryan NorburyFaculty of Sport, Technology and Health Sciences, St. Mary's University, Twickenham, Middlesex, UK. Ryan.Norbury@outlook.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0736-6131
Ian GrantFaculty of Sport, Technology and Health Sciences, St. Mary's University, Twickenham, Middlesex, UK.
Alex WoodheadFaculty of Sport, Technology and Health Sciences, St. Mary's University, Twickenham, Middlesex, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6163-833X
Stephen D PattersonFaculty of Sport, Technology and Health Sciences, St. Mary's University, Twickenham, Middlesex, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4667-9939

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess if ischaemic preconditioning (IPC) can reduce pain perception and enhance corticospinal excitability during voluntary contractions. In a randomised, within-subject design, healthy participants took part in three experimental visits after a familiarisation session. Measures of pressure pain threshold (PPT), maximum voluntary isometric force, voluntary activation, resting twitch force, corticospinal excitability and corticospinal inhibition were performed before and ≥10 min after either, unilateral IPC on the right leg (3 × 5 min); a sham protocol (3 × 1 min); or a control (no occlusion). Pain perception was then assessed in response to a hypertonic saline injection into the vastus lateralis muscle. In the right (occluded) leg, PPT was 10% greater after IPC compared to sham (P = 0.004). PPTs were also 9.5% greater in the contralateral leg for IPC compared to sham (P = 0.031). Maximum voluntary force, voluntary activation and resting twitch force were not different between conditions (all P ≥ 0.133). Measures of corticospinal excitability and inhibition also revealed no significant differences between conditions (all P ≥ 0.240). Hypertonic saline evoked pain revealed no difference in reported intensity or duration between conditions (P ≥ 0.082). IPC can reduce pain sensitivity in local and remote areas but does not subsequently impact neurophysiological measures of excitability or inhibition.

Indexed as

Ischemic PreconditioningLower ExtremityPain ThresholdPyramidal TractsAdultEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalPain MeasurementPain PerceptionSaline Solution, HypertonicTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung AdultSaline Solution, HypertonicBlood flow restrictionIschemic preconditioningNeuromuscular functionPainTranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.