Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39774953›Full record

ReviewScientific reports2025

Deep learning based approaches for intelligent industrial machinery health management and fault diagnosis in resource-constrained environments.

Ali Saeed, Muazzam A Khan, Usman Akram, Waeal J Obidallah, Soyiba Jawed, Awais Ahmad

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ali SaeedDepartment of Computer Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, 45320, Pakistan. alisaeed101@gmail.com.
Muazzam A KhanDepartment of Computer Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, 45320, Pakistan.
Usman AkramDepartment of Computer and Software Engineering, NUST College of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan.
Waeal J ObidallahCollege of Computer and Information Sciences, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, 11673, Saudi Arabia. wobaidallah@imamu.edu.sa.
Soyiba JawedDepartment of Computer and Software Engineering, NUST College of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan.
Awais AhmadCollege of Computer and Information Sciences, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, 11673, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Industry 4.0 represents the fourth industrial revolution, which is characterized by the incorporation of digital technologies, the Internet of Things (IoT), artificial intelligence, big data, and other advanced technologies into industrial processes. Industrial Machinery Health Management (IMHM) is a crucial element, based on the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT), which focuses on monitoring the health and condition of industrial machinery. The academic community has focused on various aspects of IMHM, such as prognostic maintenance, condition monitoring, estimation of remaining useful life (RUL), intelligent fault diagnosis (IFD), and architectures based on edge computing. Each of these categories holds its own significance in the context of industrial processes. In this survey, we specifically examine the research on RUL prediction, edge-based architectures, and intelligent fault diagnosis, with a primary focus on the domain of intelligent fault diagnosis. The importance of IFD methods in ensuring the smooth execution of industrial processes has become increasingly evident. However, most methods are formulated under the assumption of complete, balanced, and abundant data, which often does not align with real-world engineering scenarios. The difficulties linked to these classifications of IMHM have received noteworthy attention from the research community, leading to a substantial number of published papers on the topic. While there are existing comprehensive reviews that address major challenges and limitations in this field, there is still a gap in thoroughly investigating research perspectives across RUL prediction, edge-based architectures, and complete intelligent fault diagnosis processes. To fill this gap, we undertake a comprehensive survey that reviews and discusses research achievements in this domain, specifically focusing on IFD. Initially, we classify the existing IFD methods into three distinct perspectives: the method of processing data, which aims to optimize inputs for the intelligent fault diagnosis model and mitigate limitations in the training sample set; the method of constructing the model, which involves designing the structure and features of the model to enhance its resilience to challenges; and the method of optimizing training, which focuses on refining the training process for intelligent fault diagnosis models and emphasizes the importance of ideal data in the training process. Subsequently, the survey covers techniques related to RUL prediction and edge-cloud architectures for resource-constrained environments. Finally, this survey consolidates the outlook on relevant issues in IMHM, explores potential solutions, and offers practical recommendations for further consideration.

Indexed as

Deep LearningIndustryArtificial IntelligenceHumansInternet of ThingsDeep learningEdge computingIndustrial Internet of ThingsIntelligent fault diagnosisRemaining useful lifeTransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID39774953
PMCPMC11707003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.