Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39774931›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2025

Increasing photosynthetic benefit with decreasing irrigation frequency in an Australian temperate pasture exposed to elevated carbon dioxide.

Melika L Missen, Martin G De Kauwe, Mark J Hovenden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Melika L MissenBiological Sciences, School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1624-9527
Martin G De KauweSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.
Mark J HovendenBiological Sciences, School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia.

Funding

Australian Research Council Grant-Discovery Projects DP190102025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elevated atmospheric CO2 (e[CO2]) often enhances plant photosynthesis and improves water status. However, the effects of e[CO2] vary significantly and are believed to be influenced by water availability. With a future warmer climate expected to increase the frequency and severity of extreme rainfall, the response of plants to e[CO2] under changing precipitation patterns remains uncertain. We examined the effects of e[CO2] and different irrigation regimes on perennial ryegrass in a free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiment. Immediately after irrigation, the mean net photosynthetic rate was 21.2% higher under e[CO2] compared with ambient conditions. This benefit increased over time, reaching a 31.3% higher rate as days since watering increased, indicating a substantial increase in photosynthetic benefit with longer intervals between watering. Mean stomatal conductance was 21% lower in ryegrass under e[CO2] immediately after irrigation compared with ambient plots. However, the reduction in stomatal conductance under e[CO2] decreased as the interval between irrigation events increased, showing no difference 7-10 d after an irrigation event. These results imply that plants benefit most from carbon fertilization, assimilating relatively more carbon and losing less water, during periods with less frequent rainfall. These findings have significant implications for understanding leaf-level responses to climate change.

Indexed as

Agricultural IrrigationCarbon DioxideLoliumPhotosynthesisAustraliaClimate ChangePlant LeavesPlant StomataWaterCarbon DioxideWaterClimate changeelevated CO2Lolium perennephotosynthesissoil water contentstomatal conductance

Identifiers

PMID39774931
PMCPMC11981893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.