ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2025
A small cavity for detecting sound-induced flow.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bioinspired flow-sensing capacitive microphone.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A study is presented of a method for creating an acoustic flow sensor that is generally compatible with current silicon microfabrication processes. An aim of this effort is to obtain a design consisting of a minimal departure from the existing designs employed in mass-produced silicon microphones. Because the primary component in all of these microphones is the cavity behind the pressure-sensing diaphragm, we begin with a study of the acoustic particle velocity within a cavity in a planar surface. The sound within the cavity is caused by the external plane sound wave traveling parallel to the cavity's open surface. It is shown that with suitable dimensions of the cavity, the acoustic particle velocity simultaneously flows inward at one end and outward at the other end of the single open cavity surface. A simple analytical model is presented to estimate the required length and depth of the cavity such that the acoustic particle velocity into and out of the opening is a reasonable approximation to that of a plane traveling sound wave in the free field. Measurements of the acoustic particle velocity into and out of the cavity are in close agreement with both the simple model and a more detailed finite element model. Agreement between two dissimilar modeling approaches and experiments suggests that the dominant features of the system have been accounted for. By redirecting the acoustic particle velocity into and out of the cavity opening rather than the flow being parallel to the plane surface, this configuration greatly facilitates the design and fabrication of structures intended to sense the acoustic flow.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.