ArticleThe Journal of general physiology2025
Drugs exhibit diverse binding modes and access routes in the Nav1.5 cardiac sodium channel pore.
Article in The Journal of general physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional and pharmacological characterization of theEpilepsy & behavior reports · 2026Article
- Synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists inhibit the cardiac voltage-gated potassium channel hERG.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2026Article
- Vinpocetine-An "Old" Drug with a New Face: Moving Toward a Better Understanding of Its Neuroprotective Mechanism of Action.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Quantum Methods in Drug Discovery: An Introduction to the Theoceptor (Theoretical Receptor) Approach.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- The sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor empagliflozin is a pharmacological chaperone of cardiac NaAmerican journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2025Article
- How could simulations elucidate Nav1.5 channel blockers mechanism?The Journal of general physiology · 2025Article
- Correction: How could simulations elucidate Nav1.5 channel blockers mechanism?The Journal of general physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Small molecule inhibitors of the sodium channel are common pharmacological agents used to treat a variety of cardiac and nervous system pathologies. They act on the channel via binding within the pore to directly block the sodium conduction pathway and/or modulate the channel to favor a non-conductive state. Despite their abundant clinical use, we lack specific knowledge of their protein-drug interactions and the subtle variations between different compound structures. This study investigates the binding and accessibility of nine different compounds in the pore cavity of the Nav1.5 sodium channel using enhanced sampling simulations. We find that most compounds share a common location of pore binding-near the mouth of the DII-III fenestration-associated with the high number of aromatic residues in this region. In contrast, some other compounds prefer binding within the lateral fenestrations where they compete with lipids, rather than binding in the central cavity. Overall, our simulation results suggest that the drug binding within the pore is highly promiscuous, with most drugs having multiple low-affinity binding sites. Access to the pore interior via two out of four of the hydrophobic fenestrations is favorable for the majority of compounds. Our results indicate that the polyspecific and diffuse binding of inhibitors in the pore contributes to the varied nature of their inhibitory effects and can be exploited for future drug discovery and optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.