ArticleBlood advances2025
Maximum tumor diameter is associated with relapse risk in limited-stage Hodgkin lymphoma: an international study.
Article in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The H10 EORTC/GELA/IIL Randomized Intergroup Trial on Early FDG-PET Scan Guided Treatment Adaptation Versus Standard Combined Modality Treatment in Patients With Supradiaphragmatic Stage I/II Hodgkin's Lymphoma
A Randomised Phase III Trial to Determine the Role of FDG-PET Imaging in Clinical Stages IA/IIA Hodgkin's Disease
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A deep learning-based prognostic model for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma incorporating PET/CT imaging features.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma Today.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2026Review
- An Individualized Prediction Model for Early-Stage Classic Hodgkin's Lymphoma.NEJM evidence · 2025Article
- Newly Diagnosed Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: Optimizing Outcomes in a New Therapeutic Era.Hematological oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractTumor bulk is an established prognostic factor in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), but most patients with limited-stage (LS) HL do not have "bulk" by standard definitions. In the RAPID trial, maximum tumor diameter (MTD) was associated with relapse risk in LS-HL patients achieving positron emission tomography negativity (PET-) after doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD). We aimed to externally validate these findings in the H10 trial. Stage I/IIA HL patients, without mediastinal bulk, who achieved PET- with ABVD were included. Patients received 3 ABVD plus radiotherapy (n = 208) or 3 ABVD alone (n = 211) in RAPID, and 3 to 4 ABVD plus radiotherapy (n = 556) or 4 to 6 ABVD alone (n = 303) in H10. MTD was strongly associated with event-free survival (relapse or HL-related death) in H10 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.38; P = .003), a similar effect to that seen in RAPID (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.02-1.39; P = .02), giving an estimated 21% risk increase per centimeter MTD (HRpooled, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.09-1.33; P < .001). Effect sizes were similar for patients treated with ABVD alone and ABVD plus radiotherapy, with no differential effect (pinteraction = 0.97). Treatment modality and MTD were independent risk factors; patients with higher MTD receiving chemotherapy alone had the greatest relapse risk. This international validation study confirms MTD is strongly associated with relapse risk in patients with LS-HL achieving PET- and informs decision-making around risk-adapted application of radiotherapy. The trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00943423 and #NCT00433433.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.