Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39774754›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Predicting fiber content in herbivore fecal samples using a multispecies NIRS model.

Mariana Rossa, Emmanuel Serrano, João Carvalho, Néstor Fernández, Jorge R López-Olvera, Mathieu Garel, João P V Santos, Maurizio Ramanzin, Pia Anderwald, Pierangelo Freschi and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mariana RossaDepartamento de Biologia e Centro de Estudos do Ambiente e do Mar (CESAM), Universidade de Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1041-8227
Emmanuel SerranoWildlife Ecology & Health Group (WE&H) and Servei d'Ecopatologia de Fauna Salvatge (SEFaS), Departament de Medicina i Cirurgia Animals, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
João CarvalhoDepartamento de Biologia e Centro de Estudos do Ambiente e do Mar (CESAM), Universidade de Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9792-9259
Néstor FernándezDepartment of Conservation Biology, Estación Biológica de Doñana, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas EBD-CSIC, Sevilla, Spain.
Jorge R López-OlveraWildlife Ecology & Health Group (WE&H) and Servei d'Ecopatologia de Fauna Salvatge (SEFaS), Departament de Medicina i Cirurgia Animals, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
Mathieu GarelOffice Français de la Biodiversité (OFB-Service Anthropisation et Fonctionnement des Ecosystèmes Terrestres), Gières, France.
João P V SantosPalombar-Associação de Conservação da Natureza e do Patrimonio Rural, Antiga Escola Primária, Uva, Vimioso, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1504-1035
Maurizio RamanzinDepartment of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova (UNIPD), Agripolis, Legnaro, Italy.
Pia AnderwaldSwiss National Park, Chastè Planta-Wildenberg, Zernez, Switzerland.
Pierangelo FreschiSchool of Agricultural, Forestry, Food and Environmental Sciences (SAFE), University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4462-9153
Jordi BartoloméGroup of Research in Ruminants (G2R), Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.
Santiago LavínWildlife Ecology & Health Group (WE&H) and Servei d'Ecopatologia de Fauna Salvatge (SEFaS), Departament de Medicina i Cirurgia Animals, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
Elena AlbanellGroup of Research in Ruminants (G2R), Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6158-7736

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fiber is essential for rumen health, microbial fermentation, and the energy supply of herbivores. Even though the study of fecal fiber contents (neutral detergent fiber NDF, acid detergent fiber ADF, and acid detergent lignin ADL) using near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) has allowed investigating nutritional ecology of different herbivore species, NIRS calibrations are species-specific and require a large number of samples for predictions. A multispecies calibration would be an advantage since samples from different herbivores could be used to calibrate a model capable of predicting the fecal fiber content of other herbivores. To date, however, multispecies models have not been developed to predict fiber contents in the feces of herbivores. Here, we fill this gap by calibrating three fiber multispecies models (NDF, ADF and ADL) using fecal samples from domestic and wild herbivore species. We also evaluated the effect of incorporating sodium sulfite in fiber determination protocol. The initial dataset consisting of 445 samples of six herbivore species was used to calibrate (80% of the samples) and validate (20% of the samples) the models. Subsequently, 63 samples of five herbivores not included in the calibration set were used for the external validation of the model. Since sodium sulfite did not significantly improve fecal fiber prediction, our model was developed without this compound. The multispecies models obtained were highly accurate determining NDF, ADF and ADL (R2CAL, coefficient of determination in calibration, ≥ 0.93, R2VAL, coefficient of determination in validation, ≥ 0.91) and independent of external confounders. For external validation, the accuracy in predicting fecal samples in other herbivore species was also satisfactory, with consistently better values for NDF (R2VAL, 0.86-0.94) and ADF (R2VAL, 0.80-0.95) than for ADL (R2VAL, 0.66-0.89). We show that multispecies NIRS calibrations can be used with high accuracy to assess fecal fiber contents across diverse herbivore species. This finding represents a significant advance in the study of the nutritional ecology of herbivores with contrasting foraging patterns. In the future, widening the data range (e.g., species and locations) of the initial dataset could further improve the accuracy of these models.

Indexed as

Dietary FiberFecesHerbivorySpectroscopy, Near-InfraredAnimalsCalibrationDietary Fiber

Identifiers

PMID39774754
PMCPMC11709307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.