ArticleScientific reports2025
Strength prediction of ECC-CES columns under eccentric compression using adaptive sampling and ML techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- An optimized machine learning approach for reliable design of hybrid FRP-steel-concrete tubular columns.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Assessing the impact of groundwater abstraction and concrete dam fractures on saltwater intrusion using numerical modeling and interpretable machine learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Hydraulic Performance Modeling of Inclined Double Cutoff Walls Beneath Hydraulic Structures Using Optimized Ensemble Machine Learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Prediction of ultimate strength and strain in FRP wrapped oval shaped concrete columns using machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A novel type of concrete-encased steel (CES) composite column implementing Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) confinement (ECC-CES) has recently been introduced, offering significantly enhanced failure behavior, ductility, and toughness when compared to conventional CES columns. This study presents an innovative method for predicting the eccentric compressive capacity of ECC-CES columns, utilizing adaptive sampling and machine learning (ML) techniques. Initially, the research introduces a finite element (FE) model for ECC-CES columns, incorporating material and geometric nonlinearities to capture the inelastic behavior of both ECC and steel through appropriate constitutive material laws. The FE model was validated against experimental data, demonstrating strong predictive accuracy. An adaptive sampling process was employed to efficiently explore the design space, resulting in a database of 2,908 FE models. Subsequently, six machine learning models were used to predict the eccentric compressive capacity based on the generated FE database. These models were thoroughly evaluated and demonstrated superior prediction accuracy compared to established design standards like EC4 and AISC360. Based on evaluation metrics, the Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), CatBoost (CATB), and LightGBM (LGBM) models emerged as the most accurate and reliable, with over 97% of the finite element (FE) samples falling within a 10% error range. While the ML models demonstrate impressive performance, their black-box nature restricts their practical use in design applications. Consequently, this study introduces a proposed design that offers competitive performance metrics. The novelty of this work lies in integrating adaptive sampling through Bayesian Optimization (BO) with the power of machine learning (ML) to generate training data that effectively covers a large input space while minimizing error. SVR, CatBoost, and GPR models demonstrated mean μ, R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.