Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39774624›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Exposing the obscured influence of state-controlled media via causal inference of quotation propagation.

Joseph Schlessinger, Richard Bennet, Jacob Coakwell, Steven Smith, Edward Kao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joseph SchlessingerMIT Lincoln Laboratory, 244 Wood Street, Lexington, MA, 02421, US. joeschless@alum.mit.edu.
Richard BennetAccenture Federal Services, 800 North Glebe Road, Arlington, VA, 22203, US.
Jacob CoakwellAccenture Federal Services, 800 North Glebe Road, Arlington, VA, 22203, US.
Steven SmithMIT Lincoln Laboratory, 244 Wood Street, Lexington, MA, 02421, US.
Edward KaoMIT Lincoln Laboratory, 244 Wood Street, Lexington, MA, 02421, US.

Funding

US Air Force FA8702-15-D-0001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reporting by major media outlets influences news coverage by other outlets, resulting in an outsized impact on public opinion. Understanding this inter-outlet influence, known as intermedia agenda setting, is important for assessing the impact of state media and strategic communications. We demonstrate a novel method to quantify inter-outlet influence using causal inference on "quote following," where one outlet uses the same quote as another outlet at a later date. By applying our methodology to a dataset of quotes from over 100,000 articles published in European media between May 2018 and October 2019, we reveal obscured influence by Russian state-affiliated media over other outlets and the general dynamics of European media. We find that Russian state-controlled media have a strong influence on the coverage of other Russian outlets, including independent outlets. Moreover, this influence extends to media ecosystems of other countries. Finally, we demonstrate quantifying inter-outlet influence on the specific topic of nuclear forces treaty, as an example of precision study of intermedia agenda setting on specific issues. Overall, our methodology quantifies sources and channels of influence between news outlets with important implications for strategic communication, influence operations, and media independence.

Indexed as

Causal inference on networksInfluence operationsIntermedia-agenda settingNarrative propagationNetwork scienceState-owned media influence

Identifiers

PMID39774624
PMCPMC11707100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.