ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025
In Vitro Analysis of Pressure Resistance in the Paul Glaucoma Implant and Ahmed ClearPath 250 With and Without Polypropylene Thread Inside the Tube.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Paul Glaucoma Implant: a systematic review of safety, efficacy, and emerging applications.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025Pooled it
- Comparative In Vitro Evaluation of Tube Resistance in Glaucoma Drainage Devices with Intraluminal Polypropylene Threads.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes and safety profile of glaucoma drainage device Ahmed ClearPath® 250 mmInternational journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Pressure resistance characteristics of the Paul glaucoma implant (PGI) and Ahmed ClearPath 250 (ACP), with and without the insertion of polypropylene thread in their tubes, were evaluated. Methods: The in vitro flow pressure was evaluated at varying flow rates, both with and without threads (6-0 for PGI and 4-0 or 3-0 for ACP). Cross-sectional areas of the tube lumen and thread were measured to calculate pressure resistance using the Hagen-Poiseuille equation. Results: For the PGI without the thread, the pressure remained relatively low and constant across all flow rates. In contrast, with the insertion of a 6-0 thread, there was a significant increase in pressure resistance, with the pressure increasing from 7.5 mm Hg at 1 µL/min to 43.8 mm Hg at 5 µL/min. For the ACP, the pressure resistance remained relatively constant across all flow rates without a thread and with either 4-0 or 3-0 threads. However, the pressure was higher with 3-0 threads compared with a 4-0 thread. The actual measured pressures agreed well with theoretical values in the no-thread conditions, but were consistently higher than the theoretical values in the threaded conditions. Conclusions: Inserting polypropylene threads into the tubes of nonvalved glaucoma drainage devices significantly affects pressure resistance with various degree. Translational Relevance: PGI with a 6-0 polypropylene thread may not require external tube ligation to prevent hypotony, whereas ACP with a 4-0 thread likely requires additional ligation. Using a 3-0 thread in ACP may enhance pressure resistance sufficiently to avoid tube ligation, but this requires careful clinical consideration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.