Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39774565›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Using the Behaviour Change Wheel to develop an intervention to improve conversations about recovery on the stroke unit.

Louisa-Jane Burton, Anne Forster, Judith Johnson, Thomas F Crocker, David J Clarke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Louisa-Jane BurtonAcademic Unit for Ageing & Stroke Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3617-1410
Anne ForsterAcademic Unit for Ageing & Stroke Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, United Kingdom.
Judith JohnsonSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0431-013X
Thomas F CrockerAcademic Unit for Ageing & Stroke Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7450-3143
David J ClarkeAcademic Unit for Ageing & Stroke Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding recovery is important for patients with stroke and their families, including how much recovery is expected and how long it might take. These conversations can however be uncomfortable for stroke unit staff, particularly when they involve breaking bad news. This study aimed to begin development of a novel complex intervention to improve conversations about recovery on stroke units.

methodsInformed by previously collected qualitative data, we used the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) approach to identify possible 1. barriers to communication about recovery on stroke units; 2. Intervention Functions; 3. Behaviour Change Techniques (BCTs) to incorporate in an intervention. We subsequently sought stroke professionals' perspectives through an online survey. Respondents rated the importance of barriers for intervention inclusion and evaluated the usefulness and feasibility of the suggested BCTs.

resultsOur behavioural diagnosis identified a target behaviour of provision of information about recovery by stroke unit professionals to patients and carers. Twelve possible barriers to this behaviour were identified, with six potential Intervention Functions to address them, and 29 BCTs. Forty-eight multidisciplinary professionals responded to the survey. The six barriers rated as most important to address were: lack of confidence; perceptions of insufficient communication skills; lack of knowledge of the benefits; difficulties in deciding when and in what format to provide information; absence of private spaces for discussions; and lack of generic written information to support conversations. The developed intervention strategy comprised twelve clinically feasible and useful BCTs, encompassing the Intervention Functions of Training, Enablement, Persuasion, and Environmental restructuring.

conclusionsThe BCW approach was successfully used to begin development of an intervention to improve conversations about recovery on the stroke unit; our survey enabled incorporation of stakeholder perspectives. Further development work is required to design intervention materials and test whether the strategies are effective in improving staff and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

CommunicationStrokeFemaleHumansMaleStroke RehabilitationSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39774565
PMCPMC11706387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.