Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39774542›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

A two-level staging system for the embryonic morphogenesis of the Mediterranean fruit fly (medfly) Ceratitis capitata.

Frederic Strobl, Alexander Schmitz, Marc F Schetelig, Ernst H K Stelzer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A model for boundary-driven tissue morphogenesis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Frederic StroblPhysical Biology / Physikalische Biologie (IZN, FB 15), Buchmann Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (BMLS), Cluster of Excellence Frankfurt-Macromolecular Complexes (CEF-MC), Goethe-Universität-Frankfurt am Main (Campus Riedberg), Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5350-0194
Alexander SchmitzPhysical Biology / Physikalische Biologie (IZN, FB 15), Buchmann Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (BMLS), Cluster of Excellence Frankfurt-Macromolecular Complexes (CEF-MC), Goethe-Universität-Frankfurt am Main (Campus Riedberg), Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Marc F ScheteligDepartment of Insect Biotechnology in Plant Protection, Liebig Centre for Agroecology and Climate Impact Research, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Gießen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9217-394X
Ernst H K StelzerPhysical Biology / Physikalische Biologie (IZN, FB 15), Buchmann Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (BMLS), Cluster of Excellence Frankfurt-Macromolecular Complexes (CEF-MC), Goethe-Universität-Frankfurt am Main (Campus Riedberg), Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1545-0736

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparative studies across multiple species provide valuable insights into the evolutionary diversification of developmental strategies. While the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster has long been the primary insect model organism for understanding molecular genetics and embryonic development, the Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata, also known as medfly, presents a promising complementary model for studying developmental biology. With its sequenced genome and a diverse array of molecular techniques, the medfly is well-equipped for study. However, an integrative framework for studying its embryogenesis is currently lacking. In this study, we present a two-level staging system for the medfly based on nine datasets recorded using light sheet fluorescence microscopy. The upper level features of six consecutive embryogenetic events, facilitating comparisons between insect orders, while the lower level consists of seventeen stages, adapted from the fruit fly, allowing for comparisons within the Diptera. We provide detailed descriptions of all identifiable characteristics in multiple formats, including a detailed timetable, comprehensively illustrated figures for all embryogenetic events, glossary-like tables for selected structures and processes, as well as a stage-based quick lookup chart. One remarkable difference between the fruit fly and the medfly is that in the latter, the amnioserosa differentiates and unfolds already during gastrulation. Our staging system, which is based on systematically acquired fluorescence live imaging data, provides standard deviations for each developmental time point and serves as a template for future studies seeking to establish an integrative morphogenic framework for other emerging model insect species.

Indexed as

Ceratitis capitataAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterEmbryonic DevelopmentEmbryo, NonmammalianMicroscopy, FluorescenceMorphogenesis

Identifiers

PMID39774542
PMCPMC11684674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.