Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39774530›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Men's gender role and attitude toward sexual autonomy of women in India.

Manas Ranjan Pradhan, Prasenjit De

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Manas Ranjan PradhanDepartment of Fertility and Social Demography, International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7011-894X
Prasenjit DeDepartment of Fertility and Social Demography, International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0009-0001-0764-1199

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSexual autonomy is essential to women's empowerment and crucial to human rights. Measurement of women's sexual autonomy from men's perspective is rare in India, though critical for achieving the sexual and reproductive rights of women who continue to exhibit poor sexual and reproductive health (SRH) outcomes. The study assesses Indian men's attitudes toward women's sexual autonomy and associated factors using a nationally representative sample of men.

methodsThis study involved a total sample of 101,839 men aged 15-54 covered in the fifth round of the National Family Health Survey (2019-21). Descriptive statistics, bivariate analysis, and binary logistic regression were used to determine predictors of men's favorable attitudes toward the sexual autonomy of women. All the statistical analyses were performed using Stata with a 5% significance level.

resultsSixty-three percent of men hold a favorable attitude toward women's sexual autonomy. Men's support for women's sexual autonomy was positively correlated with their egalitarian views on household decision-making (AOR: 1.45; CI: 1.41-1.49), higher educational attainment (AOR: 1.34; CI:1.20-1.50), currently married status, media exposure (AOR: 1.17; CI: 1.12-1.21), currently working status, and wealthier household strata (AOR: 1.17; CI: 1.11-1.23).

conclusionResults suggest promoting gender egalitarian norms through educational campaigns, community workshops held by local leaders, grassroots healthcare professionals, and non-governmental organizations, and broadening existing SRH strategies by including younger, non-literates, unmarried, unemployed, and rural men.

Indexed as

Gender RolePersonal AutonomyAdolescentAdultAttitudeFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedReproductive HealthSexual BehaviorSexual HealthYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39774530
PMCPMC11709257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.