Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39774509›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Supervised pulmonary tele-rehabilitation and individualized home-based pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with COPD, unable to participate in center-based programs. The protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial - the REPORT study.

Christina Nielsen, Nina Godtfredsen, Stig Molsted, Charlotte Ulrik, Thomas Kallemose, Henrik Hansen

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05664945 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Rethinking Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Patients With COPD: a Three-arm Randomised Multicentre Trial (REPORT-trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorCopenhagen University Hospital, HvidovreRan2023 to 2027Enrolled180ConditionsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseArmspulmonary tele-rehabilitation (PTR), home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (HPR), Control
NCT07575841 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2027, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Efficacy of a Supervised Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program Performed 3 Days/Week Versus 1 Day/Week in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): a Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Universitario Fundación AlcorcónRan2027 to 2028Enrolled158ConditionsCOPD, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)ArmsPulmonary Rehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christina NielsenRespiratory Research Unit and Department of Respiratory Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital-Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0001-3928-0260
Nina GodtfredsenRespiratory Research Unit and Department of Respiratory Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital-Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Stig MolstedInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Charlotte UlrikRespiratory Research Unit and Department of Respiratory Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital-Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Thomas KallemoseClinical Research Center, Copenhagen University Hospital- Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Henrik HansenRespiratory Research Unit and Department of Respiratory Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital-Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) costs EURO 1.4 billion annually in healthcare costs. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a vital aspect of care for patients with COPD, but despite the compelling evidence, it is delivered to less than 30%. Frequent transport to the center-based program is regularly reported as reasons for non-attendance. The effectiveness and feasibility of pulmonary tele-rehabilitation (PTR) and home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (HPR) have never been investigated in patients with COPD who are unable to attend conventional outpatient PR. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial consisting of three parallel groups; PTR, HPR and a control group. 180 patients with moderate to very severe COPD, who are unable to attend in center-based PR programs will be included. The PTR group receives group-based resistance- and endurance training and patient education 60 min. twice a week for 10-weeks. HPR comprises an individual self-initiated home-based PR program with online motivational and professional counseling. The goal is to achieve at least 20 min. of muscle-endurance based exercises three days weekly for 10-weeks. The PTR and HPR group use a tablet with a conference system. The control group receives usual care (no PR). After completion of the intervention, the PTR and HPR groups are offered 65-weeks groupbased maintance program supervised once a week online via tablet. The primary outcome is change in respiratory symptoms measured with the COPD Assessment Test after 10-weeks (primary endpoint). DISCUSSION: The study aims to test a possible equivalence between PTR and HPR and their superiority to controls on respiratory symptoms. The study will provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of new rehabilitation models and maintenance programs for patients with COPD. If the two new delivery models can reduce respiratory symptoms, patients with moderate to very severe COPD can participate in both home- or centerbased PR.

trial registrationThe trial is registrered and approved by the Ethics Committee of The Capital Region of Denmark (H-22015777; 29.08.2022) and the Danish Data Protection Agency (P-2022-245-13101, 25.05.2022). The trial is registrered at ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT05664945 (23.12.2022).

Indexed as

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveTelerehabilitationAgedFemaleHome Care ServicesHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID39774509
PMCPMC11706455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.