ArticlePloS one2025
Avoiding catastrophic overfitting in fast adversarial training with adaptive similarity step size.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adversarial training has become a primary method for enhancing the robustness of deep learning models. In recent years, fast adversarial training methods have gained widespread attention due to their lower computational cost. However, since fast adversarial training uses single-step adversarial attacks instead of multi-step attacks, the generated adversarial examples lack diversity, making models prone to catastrophic overfitting and loss of robustness. Existing methods to prevent catastrophic overfitting have certain shortcomings, such as poor robustness due to insufficient strength of generated adversarial examples, and low accuracy caused by excessive total perturbation. To address these issues, this paper proposes a fast adversarial training method-fast adversarial training with adaptive similarity step size (ATSS). In this method, random noise is first added to the input clean samples, and the model then calculates the gradient for each input sample. The perturbation step size for each sample is determined based on the similarity between the input noise and the gradient direction. Finally, adversarial examples are generated based on the step size and gradient for adversarial training. We conduct various adversarial attack tests on ResNet18 and VGG19 models using the CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100 and Tiny ImageNet datasets. The experimental results demonstrate that our method effectively avoids catastrophic overfitting. And compared to other fast adversarial training methods, ATSS achieves higher robustness accuracy and clean accuracy, with almost no additional training cost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.