ArticlePloS one2024
The effects of plant density and duration of vegetative growth phase on agronomic traits of medicinal cannabis (Cannabis sativa L.): A regression analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Empirical data on the effect of plant density (PD) and length of the vegetative phase (DVP) on plant growth, yield, and cannabinoid concentration of medicinal cannabis (Cannabis sativa L.) are still scarce, leading to a lack of specific cultivation recommendations. We conducted two greenhouse experiments to investigate the effect of PD in the range of 12-36 plants m-2 (D-trial) and DVP in the range of 1-4 weeks (V-trial) on plant morphology, biomass growth of individual plant organs, and CBD concentration of individual inflorescence fractions. Empirical models for the relationships between the investigated plant traits and PD/DVP were created using linear regression analysis preceded by a lack-of-fit test. An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (p = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (p = 0.0001) and CBD yield (p = 0.0002) per m2. Total area yields in the D-trial ranged from 119 to 247 g m-2 from lowest to highest PD. DVP showed a positive linear relationship with inflorescence yield on an individual plant (p = 0.0001) and area basis (p < 0.0001) along with most other relevant agronomic traits such as CBD production, plant size and lateral shoot length. Total area yields in the V-trial ranged from 295 to 571 g m-2 from lowest to highest DVP. The yield increase could be linked to the increased inflorescence number per plant rather than inflorescence size. In contrast to expectations, neither PD nor DVP had significant effects on the cannabinoid concentration gradient from upper to lower canopy layers. CBD concentrations in inflorescences from lower canopy layers were reduced by 23% in the V-trial and 46% in the D-trial. However, with increasing PD, the proportion of higher-concentrated inflorescence fractions from upper canopy layers increased from 46% to 68%, while an extension of DVP shifted this proportion only marginally from 45% to 50%. In the context of standardized production, we therefore advocate high-density production systems that increase the proportion of desired inflorescence fractions from upper canopy layers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.