ArticlePloS one2025
Association between heavy metal exposure and bacterial vaginosis: A cross-sectional study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a prevalent cause of vaginal symptoms in women of reproductive age. With the widespread of heavy metal pollutants and their harmful function on women's immune and hormonal systems, it is necessary to explore the association between heavy metal exposure and BV. This study investigates the potential relationship between serum heavy metals and bacterial vaginosis in a cohort of American women. The present study employed a cross-sectional analysis of 2,493 women participating in the 2001-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Multivariable logistic regression models were utilized in the study to assess the correlation between these variables. A stratified analysis was performed to investigate the relationship among different population groups further, and smooth curve fittings were conducted to intuitively evaluate the correlation. According to the current cross-sectional study results, a significant correlation was identified between the high levels of lead and cadmium in the serum and the likelihood of developing bacterial vaginosis. We found that serum lead (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.06-1.72, p = 0.016) and serum cadmium (OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.01-1.98, p = 0.047) increased the risk of bacterial vaginosis by 35% and 41%, respectively, in the highest level group in comparison to the lowest level group in the fully adjusted model. Furthermore, the research discovered no statistically significant association between the levels of total mercury in the serum and a heightened susceptibility to bacterial vaginosis (OR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.75-1.23, p = 0.763). Results of our study indicated an inverse association between serum heavy metals and bacterial vaginosis risk, including lead and cadmium. Reducing exposure to heavy metals could be vital to preventing and managing bacterial vaginosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.