ArticlePloS one2024
Negative effects by mineral accretion technique on the heat resilience, growth and recruitment of corals.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Restoration and artificial reefs can assist the recovery of degraded reefs but are limited in scalability and climate resilience. The Mineral Accretion Technique (MAT) subjects metal artificial reefs to a low-voltage electrical current, thereby creating a calcium-carbonate coating. It has been suggested that corals on MAT structures experience enhanced health and growth. However, prior studies report conflicting results potentially due to different conditions, species and approaches used. We investigated how MAT influences the bleaching resilience, condition and growth of four coral species and natural coral recruitment in Kenya. Coral fragments were outplanted on charged iron tables using commonly-applied settings (6 V; 0.84 A m-2). After one month, when all tables had acquired a calcium-carbonate coating, half of the tables were taken off electricity to serve as controls. Both treatments (MAT and Control) were monitored on coral brightness, condition (live tissue cover), growth and natural recruitment for one year, during which a marine heatwave occurred. Coral bleaching was significantly more severe on MAT for all studied species. For three species, coral condition dropped sharply during the heatwave and this decline was faster and more severe on MAT. Coral growth was reduced during the heatwave for all corals and remained low for one species on MAT. After one year, the Control harboured 34 coral recruits, whereas none were found on MAT. Thus, while MAT can be useful to prevent corrosion of metal artificial reefs, we do not recommend MAT as reported here to improve coral growth, condition, heat resilience or recruitment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.