ArticlePloS one2024
Advancing nuclear transfer cloning in zebrafish (Danio rerio) into a translational pathway using interdisciplinary tools.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of Cells Repository ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- A 3D-printed microdevice for dielectrophoretic torque-driven rotation of dielectric microspheres to support development of manipulation systems for zebrafish eggs.Journal of micromechanics and microengineering : structures, devices, and systems · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Zebrafish International Resource Center (ZIRC) is an NIH-funded national stock center and germplasm repository that maintains and distributes genetically modified and wild-type zebrafish (Danio rerio) lines to the biomedical research community. The ZIRC and its community would benefit from incorporating somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) cloning which would allow the preservation of diploid genomes. The goal of this study was to advance a zebrafish SCNT cloning protocol into a reproducible community-level pathway by use of process mapping and simulation modeling approaches to address training requirements, process constraints, and quality management gaps. Training, for most steps in the SCNT protocol, could be completed within two months; however, steps that involved micromanipulation of eggs required more than four months of training. Dechorionation of embryos and egg micromanipulation were identified as major constraints because the processes were performed manually and required advanced operator manual skills. Chemical dechorionation and microfluidic devices to aid micromanipulation were identified as ways to eliminate these constraints. Finally, quality control steps to record the initial quality of collected germplasm were recommended to prevent production defects and harmonize the SCNT pathway across multiple facilities. By beginning to enhance the reproducibility of the SCNT cloning pathway, this technique can be implemented across zebrafish research facilities and facilities that work with other biomedical models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.