ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation of an acne lesion detection and severity grading model for Chinese population in online and offline healthcare scenarios.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- AcneFormer: A Lesion-Aware and Noise-Robust CNN-Transformer for Acne Image Classification.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Deep Learning-Based Acne Severity Classification Using Standardized Facial Images of Japanese Patients.Cureus · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in the Assessment and Grading of Acne Vulgaris: A Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate acne severity grading is crucial for effective clinical treatment and timely follow-up management. Although some artificial intelligence methods have been developed to automate the process of acne severity grading, the diversity of acne image capture sources and the various application scenarios can affect their performance. Therefore, it's necessary to design special methods and evaluate them systematically before introducing them into clinical practice. To develop and evaluate a deep learning-based algorithm that could accurately accomplish acne lesion detection and severity grading simultaneously in different healthcare scenarios. We collected 2,157 facial images from two public and three self-built datasets for model development and evaluation. An algorithm called AcneDGNet was constructed with a feature extraction module, a lesion detection module and a severity grading module. Its performance was evaluated in both online and offline healthcare scenarios. Experimental results on the largest and most diverse evaluation datasets revealed that the overall performance for acne severity grading achieved accuracies of 89.5% in online scenarios and 89.8% in offline scenarios. For follow-up visits in online scenarios, the accuracy for detecting the changing trends reached 87.8%, with a total counting error of 1.91 ± 3.28 for all acne lesions. Additionally, the prospective evaluation demonstrated that AcneDGNet was not only much more accurate for acne grading than junior dermatologists but also comparable to the accuracy of senior dermatologists. These findings indicated that AcneDGNet can effectively assist dermatologists and patients in the diagnosis and management of acne, both in online and offline healthcare scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.