Observational studyEye (London, England)2025
The burden of X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (XLRP) on patient experience and patient-reported outcomes (PROs): findings from the EXPLORE XLRP-2 study.
Observational study in Eye (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional Outcomes and Ocular Safety of Subretinal AAV-RPGR Gene Therapy for RPGR-Associated X-Linked Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Patterns of X-Linked Retinitis Pigmentosa Genetic Testing in England and Implications for Service Provision.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- X-Linked Retinitis Pigmentosa (XLRP): An Investigation of the Impact of XLRP on Health-Related Quality of Life of Carers in Great Britain.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Patient-Reported Social Impact of Molecularly Confirmed Macular Dystrophies and Cone-Rod Dystrophies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The Impacts of Caregiving for Patients with X-Linked Retinitis Pigmentosa (XLRP): Findings from the EXPLORE XLRP-2 Study.Advances in therapy · 2025Article
- Patient-Reported Social Impact of Molecularly Confirmed Retinitis Pigmentosa.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Advancing vision: gene therapy innovations for X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (XLRP).EXCLI journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimsX-linked retinitis pigmentosa (XLRP) is considered one of the most severe forms of retinitis pigmentosa (RP), accounting for 5-15% of all RP cases and primarily affecting males. However, the real-world humanistic impacts of this disease on patients are poorly investigated, especially with respect to burdens faced by patients with varying disease severities.
methodsEXPLORE XLRP-2 was an exploratory, multicentre, non-interventional study. A retrospective chart review was conducted to collect clinical/demographic data, including XLRP clinical stage (mild, moderate or severe). Cross-sectional surveys were used to gather experiences directly from patients by validated and modified patient-reported outcomes.
results176 patients with XLRP caused by retinitis pigmentosa GTPase regulator (RPGR) gene mutation were enrolled, of whom 169 were included in analyses. 81% of patients were male, mean (SD) age was 39.3 (17.61) years, and 20 adolescents were included. Mean age (SD) at genetic confirmation was 33.4 years (17.98), and the mean duration (SD) from initial symptoms to genetic diagnosis was 16.4 (15.66) years. Compared with patients with mild disease, patients with severe XLRP are more likely to experience difficulties with functioning in low luminance, depression, unemployment, productivity issues, mobility and daily activities.
conclusionThis is the first real-world study to collect data directly from patients on the burden of XLRP and to correlate that burden with disease stage. As a result, several areas of significant burden, especially for patients with severe disease, have been identified that should provide focus for future public policies and therapeutic prospects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.