Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39774257›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Real world pharmacovigilance assessment of drug related macular degeneration risks.

Xiaodong Chen, Shinan Wu, Shaopan Wang, Chaofeng Yu, Zihan Guo, Shiya Huang, Peixin Cai, Yanliang Miao, Shiying Li, Qian Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiaodong Chen *Xiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Fujian Engineering and Research Center of Eye Regenerative Medicine, Eye Institute of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, Fujian, China.
Shinan Wu *Xiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Fujian Engineering and Research Center of Eye Regenerative Medicine, Eye Institute of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, Fujian, China.
Shaopan WangXiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Fujian Engineering and Research Center of Eye Regenerative Medicine, Eye Institute of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, Fujian, China.
Chaofeng YuXiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Fujian Engineering and Research Center of Eye Regenerative Medicine, Eye Institute of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, Fujian, China.
Zihan GuoXiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Fujian Engineering and Research Center of Eye Regenerative Medicine, Eye Institute of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, Fujian, China.
Shiya HuangXiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Fujian Engineering and Research Center of Eye Regenerative Medicine, Eye Institute of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, Fujian, China.
Peixin CaiXiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Fujian Engineering and Research Center of Eye Regenerative Medicine, Eye Institute of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, Fujian, China.
Yanliang MiaoXiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Fujian Engineering and Research Center of Eye Regenerative Medicine, Eye Institute of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, Fujian, China.
Shiying LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361003, Fujian, China. shiying_li@126.com.
Qian ChenXiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Fujian Engineering and Research Center of Eye Regenerative Medicine, Eye Institute of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, Fujian, China. qchen2@xmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for Xiamen University 20720220056Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province 2023J011585Natural Science Youth Foundation of Xiamen City 3502Z202372007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macular degeneration is a leading cause of irreversible vision loss, significantly impacting quality of life. To enhance clinical practice and reduce the risk of drug-related macular degeneration, we analyzed drug-related trends using real-world data. Disproportionality analysis of adverse event reports from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS, 2004-2023) identified 67,683 cases involving 1402 drugs. Among these, 42 drugs were linked to significant risks, including treatments for breast cancer (tamoxifen, raloxifene, anastrozole, letrozole) and diabetes (insulin lispro, insulin human). The BCPNN algorithm revealed that 45.2% (19/42) of these drugs had the strongest associations with macular degeneration, with pentosan polysulfate sodium, travoprost, and tolterodine being the highest-risk drugs. Lifitegrast, nicotine, and travoprost were associated with the shortest onset times for ocular adverse events. Among drug classes, glucocorticosteroids were linked to the most rapid onset of ocular side effects (P < 0.001), typically occurring within two months compared to other drugs. Drug-related macular degeneration was more common in women (70.4%) and predominantly affected those aged 60-80. The incidence of drug-related macular degeneration has steadily increased in recent years. This study offers valuable pharmacovigilance insights, highlighting drugs and demographic factors linked to macular degeneration.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsMacular DegenerationPharmacovigilanceAgedAged, 80 and overDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesDisproportionality analysisDrug-related macular degenerationFAERSMedicationPharmacovigilance

Identifiers

PMID39774257
PMCPMC11707227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.