ArticleScientific reports2025
Identification of blood transcriptome modules associated with suicidal ideation in patients with major depressive disorder.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thalamocortical functional connectivity alterations and peripheral immune transcriptomic dysregulation in major depressive disorder patients with suicidal ideation.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- Immune involvement in neuropsychiatric disorders: Insights from single-cell transcriptomic studies.Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2026Review
- Progress and challenges in exploring the pathogenesis of depressive disorders via RNA sequencing.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
- Epigenetics and immunology: Under-recognized aspects of suicidality.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Review
- Sex-specific gene expression and weighted co-expression network analysis suggest distinct sex-specific molecular signatures in acutely suicidal MDD-patients without somatic comorbidities.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The risk of suicide in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) poses a major concern, with studies suggesting that genetics may be a contributing factor. Although there are many transcriptomic studies on postmortem brain tissue related to suicidal behavior, the blood transcriptional mechanisms of suicidal ideation (SI) remain unknown. This study utilized a weighted gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA) approach to investigate the associations between gene coexpression modules and SI in individuals with MDD using peripheral blood RNA-seq data from 75 MDD patients with SI (MDD_SI), 82 MDD patients without SI (MDD_nSI), and 149 healthy controls (HC). An ANCOVA was conducted to assess differences in gene coexpression modules among groups, with age and sex included as covariates. The gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) databases were used to annotate module functions. Results indicated that the magenta module (associated with RNA splicing processes) differentiated MDD_SI from MDD_nSI (p = 0.021), while the green module (related to immune and inflammatory responses) distinguished MDD_SI from HC (p = 0.004). Additionally, three modules showed differences between MDD_nSI and HC: magenta (p = 0.009), brown (related to innate immunity and mitochondrial metabolism; p = 0.001), and turquoise (associated with energy metabolism and neurodegeneration; p = 0.005). Our findings highlight that gene expression regulation, immune response, and inflammation may be linked to SI in patients with MDD, while pathways associated with innate immunity, energy metabolism, mitochondrial function, and neurodegeneration appear to be more broadly related to MDD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.