ArticleScientific reports2025
Mechanical properties and mechanisms of soda residue and fly ash stabilized soil.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research Progress on the Application of Soda Residue in Cementitious Materials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Vertical Drainage Performance of a Novel Anti-Clogging Plastic Vertical Drainage Board for Soda-Residue-Stabilized Soil.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To improve the utilization rates of soda residue (SR) and fly ash (FA), reduce environmental pollution, and enhance the mechanical properties of marine clay (MC), this study proposes mixing SR, FA, and MC with cement and /or lime to prepare soda residue-fly ash stabilized soil (SRFSS). Using an orthogonal design for the proportions, the study analyzes the compaction performance, unconfined compressive strength (UCS), and shear strength of SRFSS. The influence of various factors on the mechanical properties of SRFSS was investigated through range and variance analyses. The mechanical mechanism was revealed from the perspectives of grading and cementation. The results indicate that SR and FA significantly impact the mechanical properties of SRFSS. The range and variance analysis results are consistent: SR content of 30% and 70% has the most significant impact on compaction performance and UCS, respectively, while 20% FA content has the greatest effect on shear strength. The recommended base proportion is 70% SR + 20% FA + 10% MC. The gradation and cementitious properties jointly influence the mechanical performance and microstructure of SRFSS, G8 has the lowest planar porosity, at only 0.89%. The calcium (Ca) content in SRFSS specimens with different proportions shows significant variation, from 5.0 to 53.6 wt%, while the silicon (Si)/Al ratio (0.76-2.73) shows relatively small fluctuations. The primary hydration products include calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.