ReviewGut and liver2025
Advancements in Endoscopic Treatment for Gastric Subepithelial Tumors.
Review in Gut and liver, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Short-term safety and feasibility of laparoscopic-endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric subepithelial tumors: a retrospective observational study of the first single-center experience in Mongolia.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2026Article
- Non-exposure organ-preserving resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors using the CLEAN-NET technique.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2026Article
- Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery in gastrointestinal tumors: current applications, oncologic considerations, and future directions.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Diagnostic challenge of gastritis cystica profunda with secondary abscess formation: A case report.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- A nomogram prediction model for the risk of intra-abdominal infection after endoscopic full-thickness resection of gastric submucosal tumors.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Article
- Advances in endoscopic closure techniques for endoscopic full-thickness resection.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Review
- Natural History of Gastric Subepithelial Tumors: Long-Term Outcomes and Surveillance Strategies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Comparison of endoscopic resection, laparoscopic resection, and laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery in esophageal or gastric subepithelial lesions in a Thai medical school.Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news · 2025Article
- Expanding the role of endoscopic resection in esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Insights and challenges.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peroral flexible endoscopy is a minimally invasive technique that enables the local resection of gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs) with malignant potential. Resection techniques are mainly chosen on the basis of the lesion size. Minute SETs less than 1 cm should be managed through a watch and wait strategy, with the exception of histologically diagnosed superficial lesions, which require endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection. For 1- to 3-cm small SETs, endoscopic enucleation techniques, such as endoscopic submucosal excavation, submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection, and peroral endoscopic tumor resection, can be used. However, endoscopic full-thickness resection is preferred for histologically complete removal with negative surgical margins. When endoscopic full-thickness resection is considered technically difficult, laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) is a safe and dependable alternative. Moderate-sized SETs (3 to 5 cm) require surgical intervention because the lesions must be removed transabdominally. LECS is a less invasive surgical procedure as it reduces the resection area; however, some LECS techniques that require transoral tumor retrieval are not available. Endoscopic intervention for lesions larger than 5 cm should be used with caution for research purposes. With advancements in endoscopic diagnosis, the indications for endoscopic treatment for SETs are expected to improve, thereby enhancing patients' quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.