Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39774031›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A case study on using a large language model to analyze continuous glucose monitoring data.

Elizabeth Healey, Amelia Li Min Tan, Kristen L Flint, Jessica L Ruiz, Isaac Kohane

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07633171 (CGM- and Behavior-based Large Health Model for Just-in-time Diabetes Management), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07633171 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

CGM- and Behavior-based Large Health Model for Just-in-time Diabetes Management

TypeobservationalSponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled36ConditionsType 2 DiabetesArmsDigital Health Data Collection System
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elizabeth HealeyProgram in Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA. ehealey@mit.edu.
Amelia Li Min TanDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Kristen L FlintDiabetes Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Jessica L RuizDivision of Endocrinology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Isaac KohaneDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN ENDOCRINOLOGY AND DIABETEST32DK007028 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Karen K Miller · 1986 to 2026
$18.5M
National science foundation 2141064NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Continuous glucose monitors (CGM) provide valuable insights about glycemic control that aid in diabetes management. However, interpreting metrics and charts and synthesizing them into linguistic summaries is often non-trivial for patients and providers. The advent of large language models (LLMs) has enabled real-time text generation and summarization of medical data. The objective of this study was to assess the strengths and limitations of using an LLM to analyze raw CGM data and produce summaries of 14 days of data for patients with type 1 diabetes. We first evaluated the ability of GPT-4 to compute quantitative metrics specific to diabetes found in an Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP). Then, using two independent clinician graders, we evaluated the accuracy, completeness, safety, and suitability of qualitative descriptions produced by GPT-4 across five different CGM analysis tasks. GPT-4 performed 9 out of the 10 quantitative metrics tasks with perfect accuracy across all 10 cases. The clinician-evaluated CGM analysis tasks had good performance across measures of accuracy [lowest task mean score 8/10, highest task mean score 10/10], completeness [lowest task mean score 7.5/10, highest task mean score 10/10], and safety [lowest task mean score 9.5/10, highest task mean score 10/10]. Our work serves as a preliminary study on how generative language models can be integrated into diabetes care through data summarization and, more broadly, the potential to leverage LLMs for streamlined medical time series analysis.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1AdultContinuous Glucose MonitoringFemaleHumansMaleBlood Glucose

Identifiers

PMID39774031
PMCPMC11707017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.